2017
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian approach to estimating hidden variables as well as missing and wrong molecular interactions in ordinary differential equation-based mathematical models

Abstract: Ordinary differential equations (ODEs) are a popular approach to quantitatively model molecular networks based on biological knowledge. However, such knowledge is typically restricted. Wrongly modelled biological mechanisms as well as relevant external influence factors that are not included into the model are likely to manifest in major discrepancies between model predictions and experimental data. Finding the exact reasons for such observed discrepancies can be quite challenging in practice. In order to addr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…we did not assess the FISPO of the models used as case studies, since we did not have the tools for such analysis. Likewise, other related works have considered different instances of input reconstruction problems addressing the practical estimation problem [ 38 42 ]. In particular, Schelker et al [ 39 ] considered uncertainty in the input measurements within the general parameter estimation (PE) formulation, while Kaschek et al [ 38 ] used a calculus of variations-based approach and Trägårdh et al [ 40 ] formulated the input reconstruction as a Bayesian inference problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…we did not assess the FISPO of the models used as case studies, since we did not have the tools for such analysis. Likewise, other related works have considered different instances of input reconstruction problems addressing the practical estimation problem [ 38 42 ]. In particular, Schelker et al [ 39 ] considered uncertainty in the input measurements within the general parameter estimation (PE) formulation, while Kaschek et al [ 38 ] used a calculus of variations-based approach and Trägårdh et al [ 40 ] formulated the input reconstruction as a Bayesian inference problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reconstructing unknown inputs from outputs of open systems is useful in many settings. For modellers, the inputs provide important information about model errors and cues for model improvement or extension [12,13,34]. In biomedical systems, the unknown inputs can represent unmodelled environmental or physiological inputs, which might be interesting for the design of devices or measurement strategies.…”
Section: A Summary and Significance Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In electrical or secure networks, the unknown inputs could be attack signals, which need to be reconstructed and then mitigated. Unknown inputs can also be useful for improved state estimation [12][13][14] and data assimilation [53,77]. Thus, from the viewpoint of modellers and engineers, invertibility is a desirable prop- Table I with three different node selection schemes as a function of the number of inputs.…”
Section: A Summary and Significance Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this context, extended Kalman filtering [10], unscented Kalman filtering [11], and ensemble Kalman methods [12] have been applied as well. In addition, different methods have also been developed to address the issue of hidden variables and dynamics [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%