2022
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac1749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian approach to high fidelity interferometric calibration − II: demonstration with simulated data

Abstract: In a companion paper, we presented BayesCal, a mathematical formalism for mitigating sky-model incompleteness in interferometric calibration. In this paper, we demonstrate the use of BayesCal to calibrate the degenerate gain parameters of full-Stokes simulated observations with a HERA-like hexagonal close-packed redundant array, for three assumed levels of completeness of the a priori known component of the calibration sky model. We compare the BayesCal calibration solutions to those recovered by calibrating t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 77 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lowlevel spectral errors in calibration introduce spectral structure into the foreground signal, preventing effective foreground removal. In recent years, this problem has inspired a proliferation of precision bandpass calibration methods (Mitchell et al 2008;Yatawatta et al 2009;Kazemi et al 2011;Sullivan et al 2012;Kazemi & Yatawatta 2013;Salvini & Wijnholds 2014;Sievers 2017;Dillon et al 2020;Kern et al 2020;Sob et al 2020;Byrne et al 2021b;Ewall-Wice et al 2022;Sims et al 2022aSims et al , 2022b. Nevertheless, precision calibration approaches generally require exquisite prior knowledge of the sky signal and instrumental response, and calibration precision remains a principal limitation of 21 cm cosmology analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lowlevel spectral errors in calibration introduce spectral structure into the foreground signal, preventing effective foreground removal. In recent years, this problem has inspired a proliferation of precision bandpass calibration methods (Mitchell et al 2008;Yatawatta et al 2009;Kazemi et al 2011;Sullivan et al 2012;Kazemi & Yatawatta 2013;Salvini & Wijnholds 2014;Sievers 2017;Dillon et al 2020;Kern et al 2020;Sob et al 2020;Byrne et al 2021b;Ewall-Wice et al 2022;Sims et al 2022aSims et al , 2022b. Nevertheless, precision calibration approaches generally require exquisite prior knowledge of the sky signal and instrumental response, and calibration precision remains a principal limitation of 21 cm cosmology analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%