2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian approach to optimal sensor placement for structural health monitoring with application to active sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
147
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
147
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2), a statistical model could be alternatively employed that incorporates the probability of damage occurring at any given pixel location, as well as the associated costs of false-detects and misses. This is the general approach taken by Flynn and Todd [8,9]; however, their work effectively focuses on the pixel value when damage is present and does not consider imaging artifacts.…”
Section: Pixel-specific Performance Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2), a statistical model could be alternatively employed that incorporates the probability of damage occurring at any given pixel location, as well as the associated costs of false-detects and misses. This is the general approach taken by Flynn and Todd [8,9]; however, their work effectively focuses on the pixel value when damage is present and does not consider imaging artifacts.…”
Section: Pixel-specific Performance Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of establishing pixel-specific thresholds for damage detection, which was recently proposed by Flynn and Todd [8,9], represents a departure from previous guided wave imaging performance metrics that are focused on image quality. These metrics typically characterize the performance of an array by comparing the pixel value at one or more potential damage locations to the pixel values at all non-damage locations for a single image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferentinos and Tsiligiridis 15 proposed a multi-objective optimization strategy to implement in the wireless sensor networks via GA. Kang et al 16 investigated three-sensor configuration performance indexes and proposed a virus co-evolutionary partheno-genetic algorithm. Flynn and Todd 17 proposed a novel Bayesian scheme to carry out optimal sensor placement which could be applicable on active sensing as well. Chen and Nagarajaiah 18 presented a new method according to the GA to identify the detection filter-based decentralized controller in which numerical and laboratory results demonstrated that the strategy can detect structural damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flynn and Todd [5] proposed a Bayesian approach for determining the optimal sensor placement by minimizing the Bayes risk of false positive and false negative detection error. Thiene et al [6] developed an algorithm to obtain the optimal sensor network with the maximum area coverage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%