2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-020-3510-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian data fusion based approach for learning genome-wide transcriptional regulatory networks

Abstract: Background: Reverse engineering of transcriptional regulatory networks (TRN) from genomics data has always represented a computational challenge in System Biology. The major issue is modeling the complex crosstalk among transcription factors (TFs) and their target genes, with a method able to handle both the high number of interacting variables and the noise in the available heterogeneous experimental sources of information. Results: In this work, we propose a data fusion approach that exploits the integration… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(108 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since popularization by Pearl (1986), learning Bayesian Networks (BNs) has solidified into a steadfast research area for 40 years. It has become an important paradigm for modeling and reasoning under uncertainty and has seen applications from stock market prediction (Malagrino, Roman, and Monteiro 2018) and medical diagnosis (Shih, Choi, and Darwiche 2018) to Gene Regulatory Networks (GRNs) (Sauta et al 2020). Despite Bayesian Network Structure Learning (BNSL) being NP-hard (Chickering, Heckerman, and Meek 2004) and even simpler structures like polytrees being NPhard(er) (Dasgupta 1999), new constraints (Grüttemeier and Komusiewicz 2020), improvements (Trösser, de Givry, and Katsirelos 2021), and scalings (Scanagatta et al 2015) are presented at major AI conferences every year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since popularization by Pearl (1986), learning Bayesian Networks (BNs) has solidified into a steadfast research area for 40 years. It has become an important paradigm for modeling and reasoning under uncertainty and has seen applications from stock market prediction (Malagrino, Roman, and Monteiro 2018) and medical diagnosis (Shih, Choi, and Darwiche 2018) to Gene Regulatory Networks (GRNs) (Sauta et al 2020). Despite Bayesian Network Structure Learning (BNSL) being NP-hard (Chickering, Heckerman, and Meek 2004) and even simpler structures like polytrees being NPhard(er) (Dasgupta 1999), new constraints (Grüttemeier and Komusiewicz 2020), improvements (Trösser, de Givry, and Katsirelos 2021), and scalings (Scanagatta et al 2015) are presented at major AI conferences every year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since popularization by Pearl (1986), learning Bayesian Networks (BNs) has solidified into a steadfast research area for 40 years. It has become an important paradigm for modeling and reasoning under uncertainty and has seen applications from stock market prediction (Malagrino, Roman, and Monteiro 2018) and medical diagnosis (Shih, Choi, and Darwiche 2018) to Gene Regulatory Networks (GRNs) (Sauta et al 2020). Despite Bayesian Network Structure Learning (BNSL) being NP-hard (Chickering, Heckerman, and Meek 2004) and even simpler structures like polytrees being NPhard(er) (Dasgupta 1999), new constraints (Grüttemeier and Komusiewicz 2020), improvements (Trösser, de Givry, and Copyright © 2023, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, it is a key issue to effectively fuse the multi-sensor information. Many techniques are proposed to solve the issue, such as the Dempster-Shafer theory (DST) [1,2], Kalman filtering (KF) [3,4], fuzzy theory [5], Bayesian reasoning method [6,7], neural network [8], and so on. However, there are many uncertainties, for example, randomness and imprecision, in the real world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%