2015
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2014.2368952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian Framework for Intent Detection and Stimulation Selection in SSVEP BCIs

Abstract: Currently, many Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI) classifiers output point estimates of user intent which make it difficult to incorporate context prior information or assign a principled confidence measurement to a decision. We propose a Bayesian framework to extend current Steady State Visually Evoked Potential (SSVEP) classifiers to a maximum a posteriori (MAP) classifiers by using a Kernel Density Estimate (KDE) to learn the distribution of features conditioned on stimulation class. To demonstrate our framew… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many EEG-based brain-computer interface paradigms present good average performance for communication [1,8,18,10,9] or HRI [47,27]. Yet they often require constant operator attention, add additional cognitive burden to the user, require many repeated prompts, and leverage user-specific classification algorithms [50,36,31,34,48].…”
Section: A Eeg-based Methods For Human-robot Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many EEG-based brain-computer interface paradigms present good average performance for communication [1,8,18,10,9] or HRI [47,27]. Yet they often require constant operator attention, add additional cognitive burden to the user, require many repeated prompts, and leverage user-specific classification algorithms [50,36,31,34,48].…”
Section: A Eeg-based Methods For Human-robot Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ITR * is often lower than ITR because mistakes under a symmetric channel are uniformly distributed among all brain symbols, offering the weakest evidence (see noisy typewriter example in [37]). For further details on both definitions of ITR see [38], [39], [40], [41], [42]. …”
Section: Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are more articles about the classification algorithms innovation [122][123][124][125][126][127]. Reference [125] uses a semi-supervised training method with cooperation of two kinds of classifiers to build a integrated classifier.…”
Section: Feature Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%