2019
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2019.2899773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian Joint Decorrelation and Despeckling of SAR Imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As our proposed framework preserves original image features such as texture, details and edges, it may have a far reaching impact on medical imaging for diagnostic purpose. At the same time, the proposed despeckling algorithm may be efficacious in dealing with the speckle noise problem in other imaging such as synthetic aperture radar (SAR) [41] and optical coherence tomography (OCT) [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As our proposed framework preserves original image features such as texture, details and edges, it may have a far reaching impact on medical imaging for diagnostic purpose. At the same time, the proposed despeckling algorithm may be efficacious in dealing with the speckle noise problem in other imaging such as synthetic aperture radar (SAR) [41] and optical coherence tomography (OCT) [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the analysis of SAR imaging, three apparent causes of this granular distortion can be pointed out: propagation, antenna pattern, and the imaging process, which all result in speckle [29]. As for the effect of propagation, interference of the de-phased but coherent scattered waves after reflection and propagation results in the granular spots called speckles.…”
Section: Principle Of Speckle Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, (2) is equivalent to the following minimisation problem:fMAP=argminffalsefalse{lfalse(bold-italicg;bold-italicffalse)+ληfalse(bold-italicffalse)falsefalse}, where lfalse(bold-italicg;bold-italicffalse)=logfalse(p(bold-italicg|bold-italicf)false) corresponds to the data fidelity term and ληfalse(bold-italicffalse)=logfalse(pfalse(bold-italicffalse)false) is the regulariser. The likelihood function for Rayleigh distributed speckle is given by [18]pfalse(g|ffalse)=i=1Ngifiexpgi22fi. It is straight forward that the data fidelity term is (see [26] for more details)lfalse(bold-italicg;bold-italicffalse)=i=1N}{logfalse(fifalse)+gi22fi. In [22], it was stated that from speckle interferometry, the noise in SAR imagery can be modelled as Poisson distribution. The likelihood function for Poisson distributed speckle is given by [27]pfalse(g|ffalse)=i=1Nefi<...>…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afonso and Sanches [21] employed a blind inpainting methodology for non‐Gaussian noisy models such as Rayleigh and Poisson using TV and 0 regularisers and solved it using ADMM for medical images. Wang et al [22] came up with the Bayesian joint decorrelation and despeckling method for the restoring of SAR images contaminated by Poisson speckle. Seminal contributions have been made by Venkatakrishnan et al [5] regarding PnP ADMM, which can be considered as a modification of ADMM, where the image denoising is plugged as an intermediate step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%