2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian method to estimate single-trial event-related potentials with application to the study of the P300 variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Single-trial ERPs are estimated through the Bayesian approach extensively described in [38], which also admits further sophistications, recently documented in [39, 44], though not usable in real time and thus unsuited to the BCI setting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Single-trial ERPs are estimated through the Bayesian approach extensively described in [38], which also admits further sophistications, recently documented in [39, 44], though not usable in real time and thus unsuited to the BCI setting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, as a preliminary proof of concept of the feasibility of an assistive single-channel (SC) BCI, we assess the hypothesis that the performance of the multichannel (MC) BCI system documented in [13], with N = 5, is preserved when only one channel is employed but a Bayesian ERP estimation technique [38, 39] is used to preprocess the signal. For such a scope, an offline comparison is made by using the data collected in 21 ALS patients and 9 healthy controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually P300 is computed by the averaging of a number of trials; however, it is possible to compute P300 also on single trials. 80 Recently, using this approach, we have proven that patients with minimal HE have an increased latency variability of single trial P300. 72 This contribute to explain to reduction in P300 calculated by averaging techniques and highlights the variability of responses typical of minimal HE, which was also detected by psychometric testing.…”
Section: Motor Evoked Potentials (Meps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C: the median raw data across animals, replotted from Fig. 6. it is now well established that this model can result in a poor estimate of the evoked response, whose amplitude and latency can vary considerably from trial to trial (D'Avanzo et al 2011;Lange et al 1997;Mocks et al 1987;Truccolo et al 2002). Nevertheless, the most common method for computing the induced response component continues to be subtraction of the time-domain evoked response from single-trial responses (e.g., Crone et al 2001;Steinschneider et al 2008;Trautner et al 2006).…”
Section: Variability In Amplitude and Latency Of Additive Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%