2014
DOI: 10.1002/qre.1735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian Methodology Applied to the Estimation of Earthquake Recurrence Parameters for Seismic Hazard Assessment

Abstract: Seismic hazard curves provide the rate (or probability) of exceedance of different levels of a ground motion parameter (e.g., the peak ground acceleration, PGA) in a given geographical point and for a given time frame. Hence, to evaluate seismic hazard curves, one needs an occurrence model of earthquakes and an attenuation law of the ground motion with the distance. Generally, the input data needed to define the occurrence model consists in values of the magnitude, experimentally observed or, in the case of an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…maximum magnitude M max ), which may come from seismic catalogues and/or geometrical constraints. Since λ i (M j ) is assessed jointly for all magnitude levels, it is theoretically possible to consider the statistical dependency of the distribution parameters (Bommer & Scherbaum 2008;Keller et al 2014). In addition, given the potential impact on SPTHA of the tails of the magnitude-frequency distributions, an important effort should be put for an operational assessment to constrain the rates of large events (e.g.…”
Section: Step 1: Development Of the Etmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…maximum magnitude M max ), which may come from seismic catalogues and/or geometrical constraints. Since λ i (M j ) is assessed jointly for all magnitude levels, it is theoretically possible to consider the statistical dependency of the distribution parameters (Bommer & Scherbaum 2008;Keller et al 2014). In addition, given the potential impact on SPTHA of the tails of the magnitude-frequency distributions, an important effort should be put for an operational assessment to constrain the rates of large events (e.g.…”
Section: Step 1: Development Of the Etmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several possible methods may be adopted to assess the rates λ(M j ): classical or Bayesian joint assessments of the parameters of the frequency-size distribution (e.g. Keller et al 2014); separated assessments of mean annual rates of earthquakes and of the parameters of a Pareto distribution (e.g. Kagan 2003).…”
Section: Step 1: the Event Tree For Exploring Uncertainties On Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate these parameters, i.e., the cumulative annual rate of events (λ), the b-value, and the corner magnitude, in a catalogue with a time-varying magnitude of completeness, we used the method proposed by Taroni and Selva (2021). This approach couples the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) proposed by Weichert (1980) and adapted for the tapered GR, with a Monte Carlo Markov Chains (MCMC) computation to properly explore and estimate the uncertainty associated with the parameters, allowing for a joint evaluation of potentially correlated parameters (Keller et al, 2014). The smallest explored magnitude (the minimum among completeness levels) is magnitude M w = 1.0.…”
Section: Magnitude-frequency Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is qualitative and does not quantify the performance of the SSM with respect to the past seismicity. Keller et al (2014Keller et al ( , 2019 adopt a Bayesian approach based on the Importance Sampling technique (e.g. Kass and Raftery 1995) to estimate the recurrence parameters, i.e.…”
Section: Usnrc 2012mentioning
confidence: 99%