2017
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian Methodology for Systemic Risk Assessment in Financial Networks

Abstract: We develop a Bayesian methodology for systemic risk assessment in financial networks such as the interbank market. Nodes represent participants in the network and weighted directed edges represent liabilities. Often, for every participant, only the total liabilities and total assets within this network are observable. However, systemic risk assessment needs the individual liabilities. We propose a model for the individual liabilities, which, following a Bayesian approach, we then condition on the observed tota… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
114
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aforementioned approach has been recently extended to account also for weights, through an algorithm which is not dissimilar in spirit from the DECM. More specifically, the model introduced in [116] is described by the following probability distribution for link weights:…”
Section: A Bayesian Approach To Network Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned approach has been recently extended to account also for weights, through an algorithm which is not dissimilar in spirit from the DECM. More specifically, the model introduced in [116] is described by the following probability distribution for link weights:…”
Section: A Bayesian Approach To Network Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the same dataset from 2011 of European banks from the European Banking Authority that has been used in previous studies relying on the Eisenberg-Noe framework (Gandy and Veraart (2016), Chen et al (2016)). As in these papers, given the heuristic approach to the dataset, our exercise should be considered to be an illustration of our results and methodology, rather than a realistic full-fledged empirical analysis.…”
Section: Empirical Application: Assessing the Robustness Of Systemic mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…setting Greek bond values to zero. In our sensitivity analysis we resample the underlying liabilities matrix from the Gandy & Veraart algorithm Gandy and Veraart (2016) 1000 times.…”
Section: Empirical Application: Assessing the Robustness Of Systemic mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All parameters and quantities introduced above are assumed to be known or have been estimated before. We refer to Anand et al (2015), Gandy and Veraart (2016) and Upper (2011) for various methods to estimate interfirm exposures. Based on the previously described set-up, the balance sheet of firm i at time t = 0 has the form depicted on the left-hand side of Figure 1.…”
Section: Default Risk Model For Interconnected Firmsmentioning
confidence: 99%