2007
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2007.898321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian State–Space Approach to Combat Inter-Carrier Interference in OFDM Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first develop the state-space model of the interest. Since the CFO is assumed to be a constant within each OFDM signal, the state equation of the CFO is built as [2] 1 n n…”
Section: State-space Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We first develop the state-space model of the interest. Since the CFO is assumed to be a constant within each OFDM signal, the state equation of the CFO is built as [2] 1 n n…”
Section: State-space Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simulations, no prior knowledge is assumed for the estimation, i.e., the prior distribution ( ) p ε is the uniform distribution in (-0.5, 0.5). For performance comparison, EKF [2] and HF [3] are also applied to estimate the CFO.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of conventional approaches [1], the Kalman filter (KF) fi particle filter (PF) [2,3], etc. have been proposed to fight against here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually the problems of channel and frequency offset estimation are addressed separately. Most of the existing work for channel estimation in OFDM systems is done by assuming perfect carrier synchronization [2,1] and most of the existing work for frequency offset estimation is done under the assumption of known channel state information [9,13,10]. Joint estimation of channel state and carrier frequency offset (CFO) for OFDM systems was proposed in [7] and [3] but the estimation is based on the use of known training symbol sequences and/or virtual subcarriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%