2005
DOI: 10.1109/radecs.2005.4365562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian Treatment of Risk for Radiation Hardness Assurance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, both failure probability and cost will depend on time-probability increasing with time (as dose accumulates) and cost decreasing (as mission objectives are achieved) or remaining constant. For most missions longer than 2 years, dose increases roughly linearly with time, [11] so probability of failure as a function of time is obtained with a simple change of variables from probability vs. dose.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, both failure probability and cost will depend on time-probability increasing with time (as dose accumulates) and cost decreasing (as mission objectives are achieved) or remaining constant. For most missions longer than 2 years, dose increases roughly linearly with time, [11] so probability of failure as a function of time is obtained with a simple change of variables from probability vs. dose.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these memory applications carries with it different levels of soft error criticality risk -some soft errors may result in scientific or housekeeping data loss, while others may require ground-based intervention for spacecraft safe-hold conditions. Engineers can determine this risk a number of different ways, one of which is a radiation-specific form of failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis called single-event effects criticality analysis (SEECA) [7], another is a Bayesian analysis approach [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%