2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-006-9784-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Behavioral Analysis of Computational Models of Visual Attention

Abstract: Abstract. Robots often incorporate computational models of visual attention to streamline processing. Even though the number of visual attention systems employed on robots has increased dramatically in recent years, the evaluation of these systems has remained primarily qualitative and subjective. We introduce quantitative methods for evaluating computational models of visual attention by direct comparison with gaze trajectories acquired from humans. In particular, we focus on the need for metrics based not on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
29
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We perform a couple of experiments to evaluate the behavior of the proposed system, because a quantitative, comparative method to evaluate the performance of an overt attention system does not exist (see [9], [17]). In order to obtain a reliable impression of the performance of our system, we repeated every experiment multiple times with varying environmental conditions such as, e.g., lighting, number of objects, distracting clutter, and timing of events.…”
Section: B Procedures and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We perform a couple of experiments to evaluate the behavior of the proposed system, because a quantitative, comparative method to evaluate the performance of an overt attention system does not exist (see [9], [17]). In order to obtain a reliable impression of the performance of our system, we repeated every experiment multiple times with varying environmental conditions such as, e.g., lighting, number of objects, distracting clutter, and timing of events.…”
Section: B Procedures and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we introduce a novel definition of auditory attention based on Bayesian surprise [16]. In contrast, in computer vision a huge amount of saliency models has been proposed in recent years (see [11], [17]). Since reviewing them is beyond the scope of this paper, we recommend reading the survey of computational visual attention in [11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A substantial amount of knowledge has been accumulated, though sometimes disparate or conflicting. One of the most important findings for attention systems in machines (Shic & Scassellati, 2007) is that attention is driven by two sources, saliency in the perceptual input (bottom-up or exogenous attention) and task-dependent attention direction (top-down or endogenous attention). The former is comparatively easier to handle and evaluate (e.g.…”
Section: Attention Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%