2014
DOI: 10.1080/15427560.2014.939749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Behavioral Shift in Earnings Response After Regulation FD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are consistent with the position that investors’ judgments of risk and return, both mediated by sentiment, influence market prices. Studies identify many behavioral variables affecting investor judgment as investment-related knowledge and experience (Victoravich, 2010), financial professionals’ overconfidence (Peterson et al , 2015; Gloede and Menkhoff, 2014), decision goal (Young, 2009), social influence (Andersson et al , 2014), analyst overoptimism (Jones and Johnstone, 2012), multiple information sources and subjective confidence (Du and McEnroe, 2011), affect (Sevdalis et al , 2009), information spillovers (Hovakimian and Saenyasiri, 2014), unconditional size effect (Antoniou et al , 2014), expected information quality (Kwag, 2014), analyst’s evaluation of extent to disclosure reliability (McEwen et al , 2008) and information on which analysts base their forecasts – trend, variability and recency (Ashton and Cianci, 2007).…”
Section: Behavioral Finance Indicators At the Aggregate Level – Does Rationality Exist?: Contradictory Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are consistent with the position that investors’ judgments of risk and return, both mediated by sentiment, influence market prices. Studies identify many behavioral variables affecting investor judgment as investment-related knowledge and experience (Victoravich, 2010), financial professionals’ overconfidence (Peterson et al , 2015; Gloede and Menkhoff, 2014), decision goal (Young, 2009), social influence (Andersson et al , 2014), analyst overoptimism (Jones and Johnstone, 2012), multiple information sources and subjective confidence (Du and McEnroe, 2011), affect (Sevdalis et al , 2009), information spillovers (Hovakimian and Saenyasiri, 2014), unconditional size effect (Antoniou et al , 2014), expected information quality (Kwag, 2014), analyst’s evaluation of extent to disclosure reliability (McEwen et al , 2008) and information on which analysts base their forecasts – trend, variability and recency (Ashton and Cianci, 2007).…”
Section: Behavioral Finance Indicators At the Aggregate Level – Does Rationality Exist?: Contradictory Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%