2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.2.19444/v2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A benchmark study of ab initio gene prediction methods in diverse eukaryotic organisms

Abstract: Background: The draft genome assemblies produced by new sequencing technologies present important challenges for automatic gene prediction pipelines, leading to less accurate gene models. New benchmark methods are needed to evaluate the accuracy of gene prediction methods in the face of incomplete genome assemblies, low genome coverage and quality, complex gene structures, or a lack of suitable sequences for evidence-based annotations. Results: We describe the construction of a new benchmark, called G3PO (benc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NR hits of most of the genes are sequences of the previous release of C. gigas, and only 1,329 predictions had ab initio-based supports. The fact that the algorithms for ab initio gene prediction were mainly designed for a few specific model organisms, such as fruit flies, worms, and humans, and the accurate prediction of a gene model has always been difficult (Salzberg, 2019;Scalzitti et al, 2020), the 7,329 genes without expression or SWISS-PROT support are most probably less accurate predictions.…”
Section: Genome Annotation and Phylogenic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NR hits of most of the genes are sequences of the previous release of C. gigas, and only 1,329 predictions had ab initio-based supports. The fact that the algorithms for ab initio gene prediction were mainly designed for a few specific model organisms, such as fruit flies, worms, and humans, and the accurate prediction of a gene model has always been difficult (Salzberg, 2019;Scalzitti et al, 2020), the 7,329 genes without expression or SWISS-PROT support are most probably less accurate predictions.…”
Section: Genome Annotation and Phylogenic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method, though highly useful in determining how well a pipeline annotates more ancient genes, does not capture the efficacy of a pipeline in identifying orphans or other young genes. Recently, Scalizati et al 58 have developed a benchmarking approach that takes phylostrata into account; herein we provide a different approach to benchmarking that considers phylostrata, and enables customization of phylostrata to include line-specific genes.…”
Section: Application Of Gene Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%