2018
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggy280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A benchmark study of numerical implementations of the sea level equation in GIA modelling

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Last, SELEN 4 comes with a User guide and with a fully detailed theory background, which is particularly meant to illustrate the basic concepts of GIA to young scientists or colleagues and to allow transparency and reproducibility. 25 For simplified surface loads, recently a preliminary version of the new program has been successfully tested against other independently developed, but not yet publicly available, SLE solvers (see Martinec et al, 2018). After it has been progressively tion, Geophysical Journal International, 194, 45-60, 2013.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Last, SELEN 4 comes with a User guide and with a fully detailed theory background, which is particularly meant to illustrate the basic concepts of GIA to young scientists or colleagues and to allow transparency and reproducibility. 25 For simplified surface loads, recently a preliminary version of the new program has been successfully tested against other independently developed, but not yet publicly available, SLE solvers (see Martinec et al, 2018). After it has been progressively tion, Geophysical Journal International, 194, 45-60, 2013.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also ascertained that misfits of the order of 1 mm yr −1 are not uncommon in other highlatitude sites of both hemispheres. Disclosing the origin of the discrepancies in the two sets of GIA predictions (and therefore in the whole set of the GIA geodetic fingerprints considered in Figure 8) is not easy at this stage, and would demand a detailed model inter-comparison study like those performed in the GIA community by Spada et al (2011) and Martinec et al (2018). 10 We can however guess that the misfit between the two sets of GIA predictions stems from the different discretisations of the ice time-histories, from the effects of mantle compressibility, and possibly from the different rotation theories adopted.…”
Section: Gia At Tide Gaugesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The colatitude resolution and maximum spherical harmonic degree are the same as in the FE model. The Love number computation was benchmarked in Spada et al (2011), and the combination with surface loads in Martinec et al (2018).…”
Section: Gia Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SLE solver ISSM-SESAW v1.0 (Ice Sheet System Model -Solid Earth and Sea-level Adjustment Workbench; Adhikari et al, 2016), being oriented to short-term cryosphere and climate changes, only accounts for the elastic deformation of the Earth. The open-source SLE solver giapy (Kachuck, 2017;Martinec et al, 2018), available from https://github. com/skachuck/giapy (last access: 26 November 2019), can deal with complex ice models and viscoelastic rheology but does not take rotational effects into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%