2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A benchmark study of uncertainness in welding simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Caprace et al [5] proposed a benchmark study to understand the influence of modeler's practice and FEM codes on welding simulation results. This influence may relate to the selection of simulation parameters such as mesh size, material modeling, heat input, boundary conditions, etc.…”
Section: Fem Software Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Caprace et al [5] proposed a benchmark study to understand the influence of modeler's practice and FEM codes on welding simulation results. This influence may relate to the selection of simulation parameters such as mesh size, material modeling, heat input, boundary conditions, etc.…”
Section: Fem Software Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagram of the welding simulation procedure. Reproduced from[5], with permission from Elsevier, 2019.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we shall use the isotropic hardening model. Equation ( 4) (CAPRACE et al, 2017) represents one possible mathematical model of isotropic hardening suitable for computer simulation, where σys0 corresponds to the yield stress and σh(ε) is the plastic deformation function.…”
Section: Residual Stressesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, this type of simulation is well-used in industrial companies. It allows to estimate the metallurgical and mechanical consequences induced by welding (microstructure, residual stresses and distortions) [1,2,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], thus providing very relevant information for the quality of the final structure and for fatigue lifetime predictions.…”
Section: Introdutionmentioning
confidence: 99%