2020
DOI: 10.1515/jag-2019-0031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A benchmarking measurement campaign in GNSS-denied/challenged indoor/outdoor and transitional environments

Abstract: Localization in GNSS-denied/challenged indoor/outdoor and transitional environments represents a challenging research problem. This paper reports about a sequence of extensive experiments, conducted at The Ohio State University (OSU) as part of the joint effort of the FIG/IAG WG on Multi-sensor Systems. Their overall aim is to assess the feasibility of achieving GNSS-like performance for ubiquitous positioning in terms of autonomous, global, preferably infrastructure-free positioning of portable platforms at a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work of the authors has focused on the use of ultra-wide band (UWB) [1], wireless fidelity (Wi-Fi) [2], vision-based positioning with cameras and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) [3], as well as inertial sensors in different scenarios in GNSS-denied and challenged combined outdoor/indoor and transitional environments. Retscher et al [1] provide a comprehensive summary of the test scenarios and experimental sensor setups used in an one-week data collection campaign carried out at The Ohio State University (OSU), under the joint IAG (International Association of Geodesy) and FIG (Federation of Surveyors) working group (WG) on multi-sensor systems. Several scenarios are described for localisation and navigation of mobile sensor platforms, including vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work of the authors has focused on the use of ultra-wide band (UWB) [1], wireless fidelity (Wi-Fi) [2], vision-based positioning with cameras and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) [3], as well as inertial sensors in different scenarios in GNSS-denied and challenged combined outdoor/indoor and transitional environments. Retscher et al [1] provide a comprehensive summary of the test scenarios and experimental sensor setups used in an one-week data collection campaign carried out at The Ohio State University (OSU), under the joint IAG (International Association of Geodesy) and FIG (Federation of Surveyors) working group (WG) on multi-sensor systems. Several scenarios are described for localisation and navigation of mobile sensor platforms, including vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Multivariate Gaussian Mixture Model (MVGMM) is fitted to model the probability distribution of RSS measurements in each cell to account for spatial correlation of the RSSs from multiple APs. Successful matching rates for mobile user tracking of over 98% were achieved for the allocation of the correct cell if a user walks along trajectories through rooms in a building [ 81 ].…”
Section: Evolution Of Wi-fi Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of NLOS issues are caused by objects which are part of the static environment in the area, such as walls, furniture. The impact of static, spatially inhomogeneous structures on RF signal propagation can be assessed by means of a calibration procedure, which typically ensures also a positioning performance improvement in the areas where NLOS issues are more apparent (Retscher et al, 2020).…”
Section: Effect Of Nlos Uwb Range Measurements On Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%