2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bi-factor theory of the four-factor model of cultural intelligence: Meta-analysis and theoretical extensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
135
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
10
135
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in our view, there is less need for more new instruments, but a greater need for a structured review of instruments to outline the statistical properties and suitability of instruments for different research purposes. In addition, and likewise called for in Matsumoto and Hwang (2013), research is needed that examines the best fit factor structure underlying CQ tests (see Rockstuhl and Van Dyne, 2018), i.e., that further elaborates on how to operationalise the overall CQ construct and individual dimensions. Third, we need further research that demonstrates incremental predictive validity of both the overall construct over other constructs and of sub-dimensions of the construct for different areas (e.g., Richter et al, 2019; see also Matsumoto and Hwang, 2013).…”
Section: Trace Thought Through Time and Space: Use Bibliometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in our view, there is less need for more new instruments, but a greater need for a structured review of instruments to outline the statistical properties and suitability of instruments for different research purposes. In addition, and likewise called for in Matsumoto and Hwang (2013), research is needed that examines the best fit factor structure underlying CQ tests (see Rockstuhl and Van Dyne, 2018), i.e., that further elaborates on how to operationalise the overall CQ construct and individual dimensions. Third, we need further research that demonstrates incremental predictive validity of both the overall construct over other constructs and of sub-dimensions of the construct for different areas (e.g., Richter et al, 2019; see also Matsumoto and Hwang, 2013).…”
Section: Trace Thought Through Time and Space: Use Bibliometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, they discuss studies that look at CQ at an aggregate level (Fang et al, 2018). Moreover, there are the first meta-analyses done on the different work-related outcomes of CQ (Rockstuhl and Van Dyne, 2018;Schlaegel et al, 2017). These reviews draw an excellent picture of the research completed and indicate that the topic of CQ in international business and management is no longer in a nascent phase, but in a growth phase, with an evolving scientific community (see von Krogh et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duygusal Zekâ (DZ), Sosyal Zekâ (SZ) ve Beş Faktör Kişilik Özellikleri gibi farklı kavramlarla ayrışım özelliklerini ortaya koymaya yönelik olduğu gözlenmektedir (Crowne, 2013;Klafehn, Li & Chiu, 2013;Moon, 2010a, Ward, Fischer, Lam ve Hall., 2009). Yapılan diğer araştırmalarda ise "Short Form Measure Of Cultural Intelligence (SFCQ)" Kültürel Zekânın Kısa Form Ölçümü (Thomas, Liao, Aycan, Cerdin, Pekerti vd., 2015), "Business Cultural Intelligence Quotient (BCIQ)" Ticari Kültürel Zekâ (TKZ) Uyarlaması (Alon, Boulanger, Meyers, & Taras, 2016), "Bi-Factor Model of CQ" İki Faktörlü Kültürel Zekâ Modeli (Rockstuhl & Van Dyne, 2018), "Crossorganizational Cultural Intelligence (COCI)" (Zhou, Hu, Wu & Gu., 2018)…”
Section: Kültürel Zekânın öLçülmesi Ile İlgili Yapılan Araştırmalarunclassified
“…Van Dyne, Ang, Ng, Rockstuhl, Tan, and Koh (2012) subsequently developed eleven sub-dimensions of each of the four-factor model. Since then, research on cultural intelligence has developed significantly together with the theoretical and practical utility of the concept (Rockstuhl & Van Dyne, 2018). Cultural intelligence displays abilities that are specifically relevant to situations involving cultural diversity (Van Dyne, & Kim, 2012) and leaders with high cultural intelligence act appropriately and effectively in new cultural environments, not because of tacit knowledge or emotional intelligence, but due to an understanding and mastery of cultural situations (Earley & Mosakowski, 2004).…”
Section: Emotional Executive and Cultural Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%