2015
DOI: 10.1142/s0217595915500098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bi-Level Model to Estimate the US Air Travel Demand

Abstract: A single-level optimization model (i.e., a Route Flow Estimator (RFE)) has been proposed to estimate the historical air travel demand. However, the RFE may require a significant amount of additional data collection effort when applied to estimate travel demand in small or medium-sized networks. We propose a novel bi-level model as an alternative to the RFE to handle demand estimation for small or medium-sized networks. The upper-level model is designed as a constrained least square (LS) model. The lower-level … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many other bi-level formulations have been developed ever since. In most cases, the upper-level model estimates demand matrix and is usually formulated as a least squares model (Spiess 1990;Yang, Meng, and Bell 2001;Doblas and Benitez 2005;Li 2015a), a generalized least squares model (Yang et al 1992;Chen 1992, 1995;Yang 1995;Maher, Zhang, and Vliet 2001;Codina and Barcel 2004;Lundgren and Peterson 2008), or a maximum likelihood/entropy model (Fisk 1988;Shihsien and Fricker 1996). The lower-level model estimates travelers' responses to congestion in terms of route-choice proportion or link usage proportion using an equilibrium model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other bi-level formulations have been developed ever since. In most cases, the upper-level model estimates demand matrix and is usually formulated as a least squares model (Spiess 1990;Yang, Meng, and Bell 2001;Doblas and Benitez 2005;Li 2015a), a generalized least squares model (Yang et al 1992;Chen 1992, 1995;Yang 1995;Maher, Zhang, and Vliet 2001;Codina and Barcel 2004;Lundgren and Peterson 2008), or a maximum likelihood/entropy model (Fisk 1988;Shihsien and Fricker 1996). The lower-level model estimates travelers' responses to congestion in terms of route-choice proportion or link usage proportion using an equilibrium model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods could produce relatively accurate and cost-beneficial estimates [10,23]. It is worthwhile to point out that models that utilize posterior observations have also been developed to estimate the historical demand in commercial air transportation (see, e.g., Li et al [24]; Li and Baik [25]; Li [26]; Li et al [27]; and Li [28]) and ground transportation (see, e.g., Maher [29]; Cascetta [30]; Bell [31]; Yang et al [32]; Codina and Barceló [33]; Chootinan et al [34]; Doblas and Benitez [35]; Nie et al [36]; Lundgren and Peterson [37]; Chen et al [38]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimator could also have a bilevel structure because of the possible coupling between the derivative of path choice proportion and travel demand. Recently, Li proposed a bilevel formulation for estimating the air travel demand in small or medium-sized networks (26). In contrast to the bilevel models developed to capture congestion effects, his bilevel model was designed to handle situations in which a significant portion (unknown) of link traffic counts are not generated by the travel demand within the study areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%