2018
DOI: 10.3390/w10111545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bi-Objective Pseudo-Interval T2 Linear Programming Approach and Its Application to Water Resources Management Under Uncertainty

Abstract: In realistic water resource planning, fuzzy constraints can be violated but still allowed to certain acceptance degrees. To address this issue, in this study, a bi-objective pseudo-interval type 2 (T2) linear programming approach with a ranking order relation between the intervals is proposed for water system allocation. This developed approach can transform normal T2 fuzzy sets, including both trapezoidal and triangular types, into the bi-objective linear programming approach solved with the proposed algorith… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the complexity of water allocation, it is often necessary to use mathematical analytical models to integrate different categories of information for calculation and comprehensive evaluation in order to obtain programmatic results that can be used as a reference for decision making. Traditional approaches to solving mathematical planning models include linear programming methods, nonlinear programming, stochastic linear programming, and dynamic programming [19][20][21][22]. However, with the multi-objective and multi-variable nature and high dimensionality of current water resources allocation models, the traditional optimization algorithms are not very effective in terms of convergence, computational efficiency, parameter sensitivity, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the complexity of water allocation, it is often necessary to use mathematical analytical models to integrate different categories of information for calculation and comprehensive evaluation in order to obtain programmatic results that can be used as a reference for decision making. Traditional approaches to solving mathematical planning models include linear programming methods, nonlinear programming, stochastic linear programming, and dynamic programming [19][20][21][22]. However, with the multi-objective and multi-variable nature and high dimensionality of current water resources allocation models, the traditional optimization algorithms are not very effective in terms of convergence, computational efficiency, parameter sensitivity, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%