2017
DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2017.1319584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A biased ADHD discourse ignores human uniqueness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem is that in the current neuro-era, any model that intertwines its components too thoroughly, risks an explanatory imbalance where "the brain" is given interpretive precedence: a BIOpsychosocial model. Cooper (15), for example, delivers a proposal for a biopsychosocial perspective by criticizing five (what we believe are partly relevant) claims that (1) there is an absence of neuro-scientific evidence for ADHD, (2) ADHD is an example of determinism, (3) ADHD rest on culturally specific judgements, (4) ADHD legitimizes the use of stimulant drugs, (5) ADHD is a medicalization of defiant behaviors. Despite his ambition of criticizing the polarity in itself, he almost exclusively criticizes one pole (e.g., constructionistic, sociological, cultural) from the position of the other pole (e.g., positivistic, materialistic, biological).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The problem is that in the current neuro-era, any model that intertwines its components too thoroughly, risks an explanatory imbalance where "the brain" is given interpretive precedence: a BIOpsychosocial model. Cooper (15), for example, delivers a proposal for a biopsychosocial perspective by criticizing five (what we believe are partly relevant) claims that (1) there is an absence of neuro-scientific evidence for ADHD, (2) ADHD is an example of determinism, (3) ADHD rest on culturally specific judgements, (4) ADHD legitimizes the use of stimulant drugs, (5) ADHD is a medicalization of defiant behaviors. Despite his ambition of criticizing the polarity in itself, he almost exclusively criticizes one pole (e.g., constructionistic, sociological, cultural) from the position of the other pole (e.g., positivistic, materialistic, biological).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the relatively short history of psychiatry and mental health care, there are numerous examples of diagnoses, interventions, and explanations of human suffering that later has been questioned ( 1 ). Today, large resources are invested in research on the role of genetic and neurological factors in the etiology of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) [see for example ( 2 ), whereby neuropsychiatric assessment and treatment with central stimulant drugs are favored].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some relate it to a broadening of diagnostic criteria, but also to how both lay people and professionals have gained a heightened awareness of neuropsychiatric difficulties among children (Atladottir et al, 2015). Other have expressed worries that increased psychiatric diagnosing of children reflects a tendency in contemporary society to reduce human behaviors and difficulties to neurobiological functions in a way that ignores children's emotional experiences and social contexts (Erlandsson & Punzi, 2017), and that it serves the function of medicalizing childhood (Pawluch, 2003). Psychiatric diagnosing of children is thus not an uncontroversial phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the major discourse of ADHD presented to the public is a biological, permanent genetic disorder of the brain best treated with medicine [71,55]. As a consequence, there is an increasing tendency to portray children as dysfunctional where the definition of normal behaviors in children has been reconstructed and narrowed [72]. There is a risk that parents, teachers and health professionals increasingly view children through this medical discourse of ADHD [50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%