1999
DOI: 10.1063/1.477812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A biased Monte Carlo scheme for zeolite structure solution

Abstract: We describe a new, biased Monte Carlo scheme to determine the crystal structures of zeolites from powder diffraction data. We test the method on all publicly known zeolite materials, with success in all cases. We show that the method of parallel tempering is a powerful supplement to the biased Monte Carlo.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
222
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
222
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The sampling of configuration space is enhanced by using "jump moves", i.e. large amplitude trial displacements for the cations, and by simulating the system at 700 K. While this does not correspond to the target temperature, we observed that it provides in the cases under consideration the same results as parallel tempering [5,17] at a much lower computational cost (only one temperature is used, instead of the 14 replicas for our parallel tempering simulations). In particular, we have checked that this procedure allows us to obtain reproducible results starting from uncorrelated initial conditions, and to overcome possible free energy barriers separating metastable cation distributions, which may result in hysteresis in the hydration/dehydration processes.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The sampling of configuration space is enhanced by using "jump moves", i.e. large amplitude trial displacements for the cations, and by simulating the system at 700 K. While this does not correspond to the target temperature, we observed that it provides in the cases under consideration the same results as parallel tempering [5,17] at a much lower computational cost (only one temperature is used, instead of the 14 replicas for our parallel tempering simulations). In particular, we have checked that this procedure allows us to obtain reproducible results starting from uncorrelated initial conditions, and to overcome possible free energy barriers separating metastable cation distributions, which may result in hysteresis in the hydration/dehydration processes.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…20, except for the use of parallel tempering [33][34][35][36][37][38][39] to cope with possible ergodicity problems. We have utilized a number of 42 parallel streams, each running a replica of the system at a different temperature.…”
Section: A Sampling Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33][34][35][36][37][38][39] Any given stream attempts a swap with the neighboring streams of lower and higher temperatures in succession. Because of this swapping strategy, the streams of minimum and maximum temperatures are involved in swaps every 50 steps, only.…”
Section: A Sampling Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first known algorithm for developing MOF structures was presented in 2000 74 , the primary purpose of which was to predict new structures rather than construct databases of MOF structures. The method, titled Automatic Assembly of Secondary Building Units (AASBU), borrowed ideas from zeolite and bulk material prediction algorithms [75][76][77] . Namely, at the core of the AASBU method is a global optimization technique, where MOF building blocks (SBUs) are treated as rigid units containing 'sticky' atoms, and as these building blocks are randomly perturbed in a large simulation box as a function of temperature, nearby sticky atoms will adhere and break to dictate the formation of extended coordination polymers 73 .…”
Section: H1 Database Development and The Quest For Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How each class of material performs for a particular application is largely dependent on their physical pore characteristics, a simplified measure of which are presented in Figure 1. [75][76][77] . Namely, at the core of the AASBU method is a global optimization technique, where MOF building blocks (SBUs) are treated as rigid units containing 'sticky' atoms, and as these building blocks are randomly perturbed in a large simulation box as a function of temperature, nearby sticky atoms will adhere and break to dictate the formation of extended coordination polymers 73 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%