Uncertainty Management in Information Systems 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-6245-0_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bibliography on Uncertainty Management in Information Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 247 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Below we will see that their distinction matters for model synchronization. It also matters for query processing and is well known in the database literature [14]. Surprisingly, the issue is not recognized in UML, G…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Below we will see that their distinction matters for model synchronization. It also matters for query processing and is well known in the database literature [14]. Surprisingly, the issue is not recognized in UML, G…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This follows several fortunate bibliographies on timevarying information management, including seven ones on temporal databases [Bolour et al 1983, McKenzie 1986, Stam and Snodgrass 1988, Kline 1993, Tsotras and Kumar 1996, Wu et al 1988, two ones on spatio-temporal databases [Al-Taha et al 1993, Al-Taha et al 1994, two ones on spatiotemporal data mining Spiliopoulou 1999, Roddick et al 2000], one on schema evolution [Roddick 1992], one on (temporal) indeterminacy [Dyreson 1996], and one on temporal and evolution aspects in the World Wide Web [Grandi 2003] also advertised on Sigmod Record [Grandi 2004 The collected references, which amount to 768 as of November 2012, are partitioned into two main sections, where they are further organized according to some similarity criterion introduced by brief notes. The former main section (Sec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A survey that gives an overview of the field is presented in [26]. The most commonly adopted technique is to model missing data with a pseudo-description, called null, denoting "missing" information.…”
Section: Brief Introduction To Information Imperfectionmentioning
confidence: 99%