A bibliometric analysis of cultural heritage research in the humanities: The Web of Science as a tool of knowledge management

Abstract

Substantial research on the topic of cultural heritage has been conducted over the past two decades. At the same time, the overall output volume of journals and citation metrics have become important parameters in assessing and ranking researchers’ performance. Even though the scholarly interest in cultural heritage has recently increased world-wide, a comprehensive analysis of the publication output volume and its correlation to the shift in the cultural heritage regime starting in 2003 is still lacking. The article aims to understand the role of Web of Science (WOS) as a tool of knowledge management in academia by drawing on the scholarly output volume, the patterns displayed by this volume, and the intellectual structure of cultural heritage research based on WOS-indexed journal articles. The data include 1843 journal articles published between 2003 and 2022 and indexed in the WOS Core Collection. The article draws on a bibliometric analysis by using WOS tools and employing VOSviewer software to map and visualize hidden patterns of research collaboration and avenues of knowledge progress. The cultural heritage research indexed in WOS was found to be Eurocentric, corresponding to the increasing funding provided by European national and supranational agencies for research funding. Although the indexed research has grown significantly, the bulk of studies on cultural heritage in WOS is concentrated in a reduced number of European institutions and countries, written by a small number of prolific authors, with relatively poor collaborative ties emerging across time between authors, institutions, and countries. The central themes reflect the development of digital technologies and increased participatory emphasis in cultural heritage care. This article brings new insights into the analysis of the cultural heritage research in correlation with the emergence of international heritage governance with new institutional actors, professional networks, and international agreements, which are all constitutive elements of scientific production. The article seeks to critically assess and discuss the results and the role of WOS as a tool of knowledge management in academia.

Assessing the status quo of international employees’ adjustment research, 1990–2022: a review and future research agenda

“…For analysis purposes, we utilised the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database, renowned as one of the premier platforms for scientific citation search, discovery, and analytical information (Li et al 2018). Scholars frequently rely on this database for bibliometric analyses (Vlase and Lähdesmäki 2023). With its comprehensive coverage spanning articles from 1900 onwards (Chadegani et al 2013), the WoS database provides a robust foundation for gaining insights into trends in academic research on IEs' adjustment, a vital component of this study.…”

What are the core concerns of policy analysis? A multidisciplinary investigation based on in-depth bibliometric analysis

“…In the present study, Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection database was used for data retrieval (Vlase and Lähdesmäki, 2023 ). This research was conducted in four steps.…”

“…A rigorous bibliometric analysis can provide systematic insights into previous publications, which can not only delve into the academic research community of active and influential researchers, but also identify the current research topics, and further explore potential directions for future research (Fahimnia et al, 2015 ). Bibliometrics has been widely applied in a wide range of sectors and specific domains, for example, mapping and visualizing the knowledge progress avenues and research collaboration patterns of cultural heritage (Vlase and Lähdesmäki, 2023 ), analyzing the sub-areas and core aspects of disease (Baskaran et al, 2021 ), visualizing and graphing the evolution of research related to sustainable development goals (Belmonte-Ureña et al, 2021 ), and studying policies, such as agricultural policy (Fusco, 2021 ), medical information policy (Yuxi et al, 2018 ), and science, technology and innovation policy (Zhang et al, 2016 ). However, the research trajectory and focus of policy analysis around the world remain a black box.…”

Ukrainian arts and humanities research in Scopus: a bibliometric analysis

“…In particular, bibliometric analysis can be successfully used by scholars to reveal the typical publication patterns at the levels of journals, individual authors, or research institutions, to explore collaboration patterns (Donthu et al, 2021;Kwiek, 2021;Vílchez-Román et al, 2020;Wijewickrema, 2022), or to study the spread of innovative technologies (Agarwal et al, 2022;Liu et al, 2019;Su et al, 2019). In recent years, scholars specializing in scientometrics from diverse countries have extensively conducted bibliometric analyses on national research output within the domain of A&H, utilizing essential core citation databases (for instance: Ardanuy et al, 2022;Bui Hoai et al, 2021;Golub et al, 2020;Mohsen, 2021;Vlase and Lähdesmäki, 2023). Moreover, the results of such research performed in the context of a particular country (see, e.g., Mryglod et al, 2021) can be used to improve national regulations of scientific activity or to perform cross-country analysis.…”