A bibliometric analysis of two PubMed-indexed high-impact factor endodontic journals: A comparison of India with other countries

Mishra, Lora; Pattnaik, Prajna; Kumar, Manoj; Aggarwal, Sonia; Misra, Satya Ranjan

doi:10.4103/0975-962x.189342

Cited by 10 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 8 publications

(11 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Importantly, our study showed that European orthodontic research was not evenly distributed, since only 9 countries were responsible for around 80% of the output. This trend is not limited to orthodontics, as it was also observed by bibliometric studies in prosthodontics, 26 endodontics 27,28 or in global dental research, 21,29,30 as well as other biomedical fields such as radiology, 31 cardiology, 32 urology, 33 pathology 34 or medico‐legal sciences 35 . As in our study, when adjusting for population size, small and Northern European nations (Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland) lead compared to larger and more populated countries (United Kingdom, Germany) 21,22,29,31‐34,36 …”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

Relationship between European postgraduate programme accreditation and national research output: The case of the Network of Erasmus‐Based European Orthodontic Postgraduate Programmes (NEBEOP) in orthodontics. A bibliometric study

Rafflenbeul

Dot

Séverac

et al. 2020

Eur J Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims To assess in each European country the correlation between the number of Network of Erasmus‐Based European Orthodontic Postgraduate Programmes (NEBEOP) members and orthodontic research activity. Secondary objectives were to describe and quantify Europe's orthodontic research. Materials and methods Articles published between 2014 and 2018 in 4 major orthodontic journals (American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, European Journal of Orthodontics, The Angle Orthodontist, Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research) and oral presentation abstracts of five European Orthodontic Society (EOS) congresses were analysed. For each European country, the total number of orthodontic programmes and NEBEOP memberships were collected. Descriptive statistics were performed, and Spearman correlation coefficients and risk ratios were calculated. Results 2039 articles and 261 oral presentation abstracts were included. Correlation coefficients between national number of publications, oral presentations, sum of these, all adjusted for population, and number of NEBEOP members in each country were 0.64, 0.65 and 0.62, respectively. Risk ratios were all above 1 and statistically significant for number of NEBEOP memberships per country, indicating positive associations with national orthodontic research productivity. Europe accounted for 30.5% of publications and 68.6% of oral presentations at EOS congresses during this period. European orthodontic research was not evenly distributed, since 9 countries were responsible for around 80% of the output. Conclusions A positive association was found between number of NEBEOP programmes and national research activity. These results could be an additional argument to support similar pan‐European initiatives and guidelines for postgraduate education, not only in orthodontics but in all other dental specialties.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

Relationship between European postgraduate programme accreditation and national research output: The case of the Network of Erasmus‐Based European Orthodontic Postgraduate Programmes (NEBEOP) in orthodontics. A bibliometric study

Rafflenbeul

Dot

Séverac

et al. 2020

Eur J Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In 2017, the IEJ achieved its 50 th year of publication and, during that time, three studies have been conducted to analyse retrospectively a variety of publication trends. A retrospective observational study analysed the number and trends of publications in the IEJ and Journal of Endodontics ( JOE ) from 2009 to 2014 (Mishra et al, 2016). Ahmad et al (2019) undertook an analysis of the top 100 most cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses within seven endodontic journals, including the IEJ .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Five decades of the International Endodontic Journal: Bibliometric overview 1967–2020

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim The International Endodontic Journal (IEJ) has served as a platform for research and clinical practice in Endodontics since 1967. This study provides a bibliographic analysis and overview of the publications that have appeared in the IEJ from 1967 to 2020. Methodology A literature search was performed in Elsevier's Scopus database to locate all the publications of the International Endodontic Journal. Various bibliometric software packages including the open‐source visualization software Gephi and Biblioshiny (version 2.0) were employed for data visualization and analysis. Results A total of 3739 records with citation and bibliographic details were selected and retrieved to allow a bibliometric analysis to be performed. The bibliometric analysis indicates that the IEJ has grown both in terms of productivity and influence. Over time, the journal has been associated with an increase in the number of manuscripts published and the citations they have attracted, but with minor downward fluctuations in citations in the last few years. Bibliographic coupling of the IEJ articles revealed that the major research themes published in the journal include ‘endodontics’, ‘root canal treatment’, ‘calcium hydroxide’, ‘apical periodontitis’, ‘mineral trioxide aggregate’, ‘microbiology’, ‘cyclic fatigue’, ‘cone‐beam computed tomography’ and ‘micro‐computed tomography’. Authors affiliated to institutions in the UK were the major contributors to the journal and were linked with other countries such as Brazil, USA and Malaysia. The largest number of publications were from the University of São Paulo, Brazil. Conclusion The IEJ is one of the leading journals in Endodontology and has been providing a platform for innovative research and clinical reports for more than 50 years. Publications have been associated with a wide range of authors, institutions and countries around the world.

show abstract

“…Our findings are in accordance with the work done by Rao et al ,[ 18 ] Mishra et al . [ 19 ] and Jain et al . [ 20 ]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Journal of family medicine and primary care- A five year bibliometric analysis from 2016 to 2020

Mohan

Thakur

Mohan

et al. 2022

Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To conduct a five-year bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care (J Family Med Prim Care) between 2016 and 2020. Setting and Design: This retrospective secondary data analysis was conducted in the Department of Conservative, Endodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry, Dental Institute, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand and Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Bareilly, UP. Material and Methods: The data of publications including research articles, review and case reports excluding editorials and letters to the editor, commentaries and invited articles published in the J Family Med Prim Care between 2016 and 2020 were downloaded from the journal website and analysed in terms of the bibliometric parameters. Results: The results revealed that the journal gave equal weightage to all types of articles. The total number of articles published between 2016 and 2020 was 2,426 out of which 1,666 articles were published from India and the remaining from other parts of the world. In India, the state of Delhi had the maximum publications while speciality Preventive and Social Medicine (22.42%) and General Medicine (23.12%) had the maximum articles. Moreover, between 2016 and 2020, J Family Med Prim Care had 2,132 citations of published articles and had 65 publications in 2020 about the Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Conclusion: The issue numbers per year for J Family Med Prim Care has gradually increased over time. The publication is open for all fields of medical, dental sciences and allied sciences.

show abstract

A bibliometric analysis of two PubMed-indexed high-impact factor endodontic journals: A comparison of India with other countries

Cited by 10 publications

References 8 publications

Relationship between European postgraduate programme accreditation and national research output: The case of the Network of Erasmus‐Based European Orthodontic Postgraduate Programmes (NEBEOP) in orthodontics. A bibliometric study

Relationship between European postgraduate programme accreditation and national research output: The case of the Network of Erasmus‐Based European Orthodontic Postgraduate Programmes (NEBEOP) in orthodontics. A bibliometric study

Five decades of the International Endodontic Journal: Bibliometric overview 1967–2020

Journal of family medicine and primary care- A five year bibliometric analysis from 2016 to 2020

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About