2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bifacial photovoltaic thermal system design with parameter optimization and performance beneficial validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MEA was used to describe the effect of changes in specific factor levels on the observed values, and a response graph were used to observe the corresponding factor values to determine the most influential variation factor of the entire experiment. [30][31][32] When the main factor effect was higher, this factor would have a greater impact on the experiment. Conversely, when the main factor effect was lower, this factor would have a smaller impact on the experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEA was used to describe the effect of changes in specific factor levels on the observed values, and a response graph were used to observe the corresponding factor values to determine the most influential variation factor of the entire experiment. [30][31][32] When the main factor effect was higher, this factor would have a greater impact on the experiment. Conversely, when the main factor effect was lower, this factor would have a smaller impact on the experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the factor number and level value in this study use the last six sets of factors of L 18 (2 1 Â 3 7 ) as the orthogonal array for this experiment. [38][39][40] The control factor levels are adjusted, as shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Taguchi Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of proposals is reduced until the criteria with multiple advantageous proposals are left for multiple attribute decision-making analysis. 19,20 The advantages of ELECTRE include straightforward decision-making logic and systematic processes, as well as clarification of the performance of various proposals. The proposals are classified as Reject and Non-reject and the concordance and discordance indexes of the proposals are established.…”
Section: Electrementioning
confidence: 99%