2015
DOI: 10.37236/4561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bijective Proof of the Alladi-Andrews-Gordon Partition Theorem

Abstract: Based on the combinatorial proof of Schur's partition theorem given by Bressoud, and the combinatorial proof of Alladi's partition theorem given by Padmavathamma, Raghavendra and Chandrashekara, we obtain a bijective proof of a partition theorem of Alladi, Andrews and Gordon.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For any positive integer n, the number of partitions of n into distinct parts congruent to 2, 4, 5 mod 6 is equal to the number of partitions of n into parts different from 1 and 3, and where parts differ by at least six with equality only if parts are congruent to 2, 4, 5 mod 6. Like Schur's theorem, Göllnitz's identity can be proved using q-difference equations [5] and an elegant Bressoud-style bijection [8,10].…”
Section: Introduction and Statements Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For any positive integer n, the number of partitions of n into distinct parts congruent to 2, 4, 5 mod 6 is equal to the number of partitions of n into parts different from 1 and 3, and where parts differ by at least six with equality only if parts are congruent to 2, 4, 5 mod 6. Like Schur's theorem, Göllnitz's identity can be proved using q-difference equations [5] and an elegant Bressoud-style bijection [8,10].…”
Section: Introduction and Statements Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, with n = 49, the partitions of the first kind are (35, 10, 4), (34, 11, 4), (28, 11, 10), (23, 22, 4), (23, 16, 10), (22,16,11) and (16,11,10,8,4) and the partitions of the second kind are (35, 14), (34, 15), (33, 16), (45, 4), (39, 10), (38, 11) and (27, 18, 4) • Corollary 1.1 may be compared with Theorem 3 of [1], which is Theorem 1.5 transformed by (1.18) but with the dilation q → q 15 instead of q → q 12 . The paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example 1.4. For example, with n = 49, the partitions of the first kind are (35,10,4), (34,11,4), (28,11,10), (23,22,4), (23,16,10), (22,16,11) and (16,11,10,8,4) and the partitions of the second kind are (35,14), (34,15), (33,16), (45,4), (39, 10), (38,11) and (27, 18, 4) •…”
Section: Introduction and Statements Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%