2021
DOI: 10.1175/mwr-d-20-0230.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bimodal Diagnostic Cloud Fraction Parameterization. Part II: Evaluation and Resolution Sensitivity

Abstract: A wide range of approaches exists to account for subgrid cloud variability in regional simulations of the atmosphere. This paper addresses the following questions: (1) Is there still benefit in representing subgrid variability of cloud in convection-permitting simulations? (2) What is the sensitivity to the cloud fraction parameterization complexity? (3) Are current cloud fraction parameterizations scale-aware across convection-permitting resolutions? These questions are addressed for regional simulations of a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It tends to underestimate the cloud cover that would be expected from the moist part, as it assumes the grid box mean RH is representative of uniform layer conditions. Recently, Weverberg et al (2021b) developed a cloud cover parameterisation ideally suited to these situations: the cloud fraction and water content are derived from a bimodal probability distribution function representing the sub-grid saturation variations, with a dry and a moist mode. The scheme improves several cloud properties in regional simulations compared with schemes assuming a unimodal PDF, such as implicitly assumed in the Sundqvist scheme (Weverberg et al, 2021a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It tends to underestimate the cloud cover that would be expected from the moist part, as it assumes the grid box mean RH is representative of uniform layer conditions. Recently, Weverberg et al (2021b) developed a cloud cover parameterisation ideally suited to these situations: the cloud fraction and water content are derived from a bimodal probability distribution function representing the sub-grid saturation variations, with a dry and a moist mode. The scheme improves several cloud properties in regional simulations compared with schemes assuming a unimodal PDF, such as implicitly assumed in the Sundqvist scheme (Weverberg et al, 2021a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the version of the PC2 scheme that is used in the RA2‐T configuration. A fourth configuration (“bimodal”) uses the diagnostic bimodal CF scheme (Van Weverberg et al ., 2021b). This scheme was developed to better link the subgrid thermodynamic variability with assumptions in the boundary‐layer scheme and to account for the impact of coexistence of two modes of variability within a grid box near entrainment zones.…”
Section: Model Set‐up and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter simply assumes that the CF is one as soon as some condensate is present. In addition, a new approach was tested, which combines the diagnostic bimodal scheme for liquid clouds, following Van Weverberg et al (2021b) with prognostic ice clouds, following Wilson et al (2008). This hybrid scheme aims at combining the strengths of PC2 at predicting precipitation and high clouds with the benefits of the bimodal scheme for low cloud cover.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations