2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.04.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A binary-real-coded differential evolution for unit commitment problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 is compared the costs of 10 units test system with and without initial state and cold/hot startup cost analysis named cases 1-3. Comparing of the results for 10 units test system given in [36] and [37] shows that the scheduling power for 24 h is the same as Table 1 in current paper and the only difference is that at hour 20 of the papers [36,37] the hot start-up cost is used for units 6-8 while considering the start-up data for these unit shows that the mentioned units should be start up as cold units. The results for three cases are indicated in Table 1 and are compared with the other reported results at recent published papers.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Table 1 is compared the costs of 10 units test system with and without initial state and cold/hot startup cost analysis named cases 1-3. Comparing of the results for 10 units test system given in [36] and [37] shows that the scheduling power for 24 h is the same as Table 1 in current paper and the only difference is that at hour 20 of the papers [36,37] the hot start-up cost is used for units 6-8 while considering the start-up data for these unit shows that the mentioned units should be start up as cold units. The results for three cases are indicated in Table 1 and are compared with the other reported results at recent published papers.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…GA [25] 565,825 LR [25] 565,825 IBPSO [43] 563,999 LRPSO [43] 565,870 DBDE [44] 563,977 DE [45] 563,938 ES-EPSO [46] 563,938 ELR [26] 563,977 LRGA [40] 564,800…”
Section: Methods Generation Cost ($)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed GA-based solution method, the scheduled UC cost of D1 has been compared with several benchmark results. These benchmark methods include GA [25], LR [25], IBPSO [43], LRPSO [43], DBDE [44], DE [45], ES-EPSO [46], ELR [26] and LRGA [40]. As is clearly shown in Table 5, the comparison indicates that the solution quality of D1 ($563937.687) is among the best one from the relevant literature.…”
Section: Deterministic Cases Of Wind and Solar Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can assume that BESS should return to the initial state after a cycle of operation to support a continuous operation for next time span. The model of energy storage devices when electric vehicles are merged can add an extra constraint shown as (15).…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…soc,i = S set soc (15) Apart from former model merging, the uncertainty for the intermittent energy is also considered in this paper described as a solution space for specify scenario. The prediction for intermittent energy is p t ψ,i .…”
Section: S T Setmentioning
confidence: 99%