2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2019.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A binary-tree element subdivision method for evaluation of nearly singular domain integrals with continuous or discontinuous kernel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, there are many methods have been developed to handle the weak singular integrals, such as integral simplification method [24], element subdivision methods [25][26] and polar coordinate transformation methods [20,[27][28][29][30][31]. When the position of the source point is close to the boundaries of the element, the computational accuracy cannot be guaranteed only by using the coordinate transformation method [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there are many methods have been developed to handle the weak singular integrals, such as integral simplification method [24], element subdivision methods [25][26] and polar coordinate transformation methods [20,[27][28][29][30][31]. When the position of the source point is close to the boundaries of the element, the computational accuracy cannot be guaranteed only by using the coordinate transformation method [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subdivision scheme can be considered as the generalization of discrete modeling by spline representation, such as the Catmull-Clark subdivision [17], Doo-Sabin subdivision [18], Loop subdivision [19], and other classes of interpolatory subdivision schemes. The adaptive subdivision algorithm [20][21][22][23] is less cumbersome by defining the refinement rules to add new points as linear combinations of old ones. The process continues until the given terminating criteria for all discrete segments or patches are not met.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%