2009
DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.136606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Binding Resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A critical difference between the reports of these putative ABA receptors-GCR2, GTG1/GTG2, CHLHand those of the PYR/PYL/RCAR family is that the evidence for the former candidates has not been independently corroborated. Jones and Sussman (2009) proposed the application of strict biochemical criteria when evaluating the candidacy of a protein as a hormone receptor. It may be difficult for one or even two publications by a single research group to meet all of the desirable criteria these authors list.…”
Section: Other Putative Aba Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical difference between the reports of these putative ABA receptors-GCR2, GTG1/GTG2, CHLHand those of the PYR/PYL/RCAR family is that the evidence for the former candidates has not been independently corroborated. Jones and Sussman (2009) proposed the application of strict biochemical criteria when evaluating the candidacy of a protein as a hormone receptor. It may be difficult for one or even two publications by a single research group to meet all of the desirable criteria these authors list.…”
Section: Other Putative Aba Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To confirm these criticisms, we will refer to very recent manuscripts that do not agree with certain publications listed in section 6.1. In the last two years: propose that "A ligand binds to its cognate receptor reversibly, saturably, selectively, and with a stoichiometry of one or more molecules of ligand per molecule protein and the binding is usually heat sensitive and affected by proteases"; 168 150 with the isolation and characterization of GTG1 and GTG2, novel GPCR proteins, may be closer to the coveted ABA receptor(s). However, some experimental criticisms (i.e., protein purification and ABA-binding experiments) still cast a shadow over the protocole carried out by the Pandey group.…”
Section: News Views and Controversiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Jones and Sussman (reviewed in ref. 5) a receptor binds the agonist reversibly, stereospecifically, selectively, and in a defined stoichiometry. The K D should correspond to concentrations which are able to induce responses when applied in physiological experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%