2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2022.124678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bio-based elastomer from cornstalk pith scaffold and natural rubber complexing with ferric ions: Preparation and mechanical properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comprehensive comparison of reported biobased polyurethane foams, such as lignin-derived PU foam (LPUF), magnetic lignin-based polyurethane foam (MLPUF), cellulose nanofiber foam (CNF), biobased PU composite foam (FR), albumin/Pinus pinaster tannin foam (CPM), lignin-containing polyurethane foam (LPU), multiwalled carbon nanotube/cellulose/thermoplastic polyurethane hybrid foam (C20/TPU foam), commercial cushion foam, and carbon nanotube/waterborne polyurethane foam (WCT foam), including the stress reduction rate and cycle numbers, is shown in Figure . The SPUF composite foam exhibited an exceptionally high recovery rate of 98.6% at ε = 80% even after 150 cycles, which is outstanding among other foams, indicating that the addition of a small amount of soy-hydrolyzed protein to polyurethane foam is indeed a good strategy to improve foam performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive comparison of reported biobased polyurethane foams, such as lignin-derived PU foam (LPUF), magnetic lignin-based polyurethane foam (MLPUF), cellulose nanofiber foam (CNF), biobased PU composite foam (FR), albumin/Pinus pinaster tannin foam (CPM), lignin-containing polyurethane foam (LPU), multiwalled carbon nanotube/cellulose/thermoplastic polyurethane hybrid foam (C20/TPU foam), commercial cushion foam, and carbon nanotube/waterborne polyurethane foam (WCT foam), including the stress reduction rate and cycle numbers, is shown in Figure . The SPUF composite foam exhibited an exceptionally high recovery rate of 98.6% at ε = 80% even after 150 cycles, which is outstanding among other foams, indicating that the addition of a small amount of soy-hydrolyzed protein to polyurethane foam is indeed a good strategy to improve foam performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al used the hydrophilicity of CSP to prepare a low-cost, ultralightweight, water-absorbent material by high-shear mixing and freeze-drying. Using the natural structure and elasticity of CSP, Meng et al prepared a biobased composite elastomer by interpenetrating it with natural rubber so that the chelation of organic ligands with inorganic ions constructed dynamic reversible bonds. Previous researchers have investigated the use of CSP to some extent and many breakthroughs have been made in the application of other biobased materials ; however, there have been no reports about the preparation of piezoresistive external pressure sensors based on corn stalk by using the natural three-dimensional porous structure inside CSP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, CSP demonstrates significant potential for development and has garnered attention from researchers. 39,40,41 However, there have been no reports on the utilization of CSP as an advanced bio-based conductive hydrogel. Therefore, considering that CSP mainly consist of most cellulose and a minor fraction of hemicellulose and lignin, in this paper, a CSP-based conductive hydrogel was successfully developed by using the proportion of its natural components (about 70% cellulose, 20% hemicellulose, and 10% lignin).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%