2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2014.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bioactivity based comparison of Echinacea purpurea extracts obtained by various processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the results presented in the current study and the literature data [ 39 ] can be explained, most likely, by the influence of environmental factors and cultivar quality, leading us to the conclusion that E. purpurea samples grown under native conditions exhibit a lower intake of phenolic compounds. At the same time, the selected extraction methods (using milder conditions and “greener” solvents) could also negatively influence the total phenolic content.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference between the results presented in the current study and the literature data [ 39 ] can be explained, most likely, by the influence of environmental factors and cultivar quality, leading us to the conclusion that E. purpurea samples grown under native conditions exhibit a lower intake of phenolic compounds. At the same time, the selected extraction methods (using milder conditions and “greener” solvents) could also negatively influence the total phenolic content.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…11 mg catechin equivalents/100 g ethanolic extracts [ 38 ] and between 10 and 33 quercitin equivalents/g dry weight for different parts of E. purpurea extracts grown in supplemented soil [ 40 ]. The total flavonoid content observed in this study was higher than the flavonoid contents reported by other authors [ 39 ], leading to the conclusion that the selected methods positively influenced the total flavonoid content.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Various extraction techniques were already employed to extract bioactive compounds from E. purpurea . Classical extraction, such as solvent extraction with or without stirring, infusions, decoctions, maceration, and soxhlet [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ], uses high temperatures to obtain high yields of the bioactive compounds [ 36 ]. However, it is well known that temperature can denature several compounds, reducing their biological activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is well known that temperature can denature several compounds, reducing their biological activity. Despite the use of ultrasounds [ 37 ] and microwaves [ 30 ] present many advantages in comparison with the classical methods (e.g., less extraction time and solvent consumption and higher yield), they are also associated with degradation and loss of integrity of bioactive compounds, due to the production of radicals [ 37 ]. Besides the technique, the solvent used in the extraction also affects drastically the amount and type of bioactive compounds extracted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free radical scavenging activities of extracts were determined as reported previously. 26 The extracts dissolved in 4 mL of ethanol were added to 0.5 mL of 1 mM methanolic solution of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl hydrate (DPPH) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The contents were stirred for 15 s and then left at room temperature in the dark for 30 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%