2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A biokinetic model for nickel released from cardiovascular devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, we adopted a continuum approach and approximated the core/shell coating layer as a biphasic material, providing two independent routes of transport for each drug. These two routes could result from surface preparation methods and may correspond to the drug phases being either fully embedded within the coating layer (slow release) or connected to the surface by pores or other defects (fast release) 34 .…”
Section: Mathematical Modeling Of Drug Release In Vitromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, we adopted a continuum approach and approximated the core/shell coating layer as a biphasic material, providing two independent routes of transport for each drug. These two routes could result from surface preparation methods and may correspond to the drug phases being either fully embedded within the coating layer (slow release) or connected to the surface by pores or other defects (fast release) 34 .…”
Section: Mathematical Modeling Of Drug Release In Vitromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of a semi-empirical approach is the work of Tzafriri et al [13] where a two-part equation involving an exponential and a √ t term is used to describe release of surface-connected drug and percolating drug, respectively. This biphasic approach has also been adopted in other applications, such as nickel release from an oxide layer [25].…”
Section: In Vitro Drug Elution Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objectives of the nonclinical evaluation of biotherapeutics are: (1) identification of target organs for toxicity and to determine whether the toxicity is reversible after the treatment has stopped; (2) identification of a safe starting dose for human Phase I clinical trials and subsequent dose escalation schemes, which is highly dependent on the patient population for the Phase I trial(s); and (3) provide information to monitor safety parameters in clinical trials [ 5 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Key factors that must be considered for mAb development are: knowledge of the antigen target biology and location of the target, both desired and undesired.…”
Section: Nonclinical Safety Evaluations For Mabsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional factors include pharmacological properties and mechanism of action of the therapeutic mAb; exposure–response relationships; estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters and how these may relate to the determination of a recovery period; and clearly defined clinical trial design and potential characteristics and co-morbidities of patients [ 5 ]. In the development process, non-clinical studies rarely identify toxicities that are dose limiting and the selection of a pharmacologically relevant species is of paramount importance [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Accordingly, the lack of toxicity related to significant decreased or a lack of pharmacological action in the model negates the use of lack of toxicity to be used as a measure of safety.…”
Section: Nonclinical Safety Evaluations For Mabsmentioning
confidence: 99%