2018
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Biological Signature for Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Predict Radiotherapy Benefit and Assess Recurrence Risk

Abstract: The DS was prognostic for risk and predicted RT benefit for DCIS patients. DS identified a clinically meaningful low-risk group and a group with elevated 10-year risks that received substantial RT benefit over baseline.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
85
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
8
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DS was calculated using seven IHC-evaluated biomarkers (COX-2, FOXA1, HER2, Ki-67, p16/INK4A, PR, and SIAH2) plus four clinicopathologic factors (age at diagnosis, tumor size, palpability, and surgical margin status) using a predetermined nonlinear algorithm designed to estimate the likelihood of TotBE risk for 10 years following treatment by BCS with or without adjuvant radiotherapy. The DS is a continuous number ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores reflecting higher risk (15). Staining of protein biomarkers in the FFPE tissues was performed at the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified PreludeDx laboratory within 2 weeks of receipt, with scoring methods as described previously (15) and in the Supplementary Materials and Methods.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The DS was calculated using seven IHC-evaluated biomarkers (COX-2, FOXA1, HER2, Ki-67, p16/INK4A, PR, and SIAH2) plus four clinicopathologic factors (age at diagnosis, tumor size, palpability, and surgical margin status) using a predetermined nonlinear algorithm designed to estimate the likelihood of TotBE risk for 10 years following treatment by BCS with or without adjuvant radiotherapy. The DS is a continuous number ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores reflecting higher risk (15). Staining of protein biomarkers in the FFPE tissues was performed at the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified PreludeDx laboratory within 2 weeks of receipt, with scoring methods as described previously (15) and in the Supplementary Materials and Methods.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DS is a continuous number ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores reflecting higher risk (15). Staining of protein biomarkers in the FFPE tissues was performed at the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified PreludeDx laboratory within 2 weeks of receipt, with scoring methods as described previously (15) and in the Supplementary Materials and Methods. The testing was performed on intact FFPE tissue mounted slides, which preserved tissue architecture.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The molecular mechanisms promoting DCIS progression to invasive disease remain largely unknown . Current diagnostic strategies focus on assessing the risk of recurrence after DCIS treatment but do not evaluate or define if a DCIS lesion is predicted to progress . Without a clinical method to identify which DCIS will progress, diagnosed women will undergo surgery and postoperative radiotherapy and/or endocrine therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, another biologic signature was developed and validated: The DCISion RT score seems to be a valid prognostic and predictive marker for DCIS, allowing for the identification of low-risk DCIS that would not benefit from radiotherapy, elevated risk cases where postoperative radiotherapy may result to risk reduction up to 70%, but it also reclassified patients deemed as low-risk by clinicopathological criteria such as screening detection, small size, non-high grade, no mass effect and vice versa [69].…”
Section: The Role Of Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Its Safe Omissionmentioning
confidence: 99%