2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A biomechanical study comparing polyaxial locking screw mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously shown in quasi‐static tests, tilted fixed angle locking screws failed at a low bending moment and were therefore not considered in the current study . Loosening of fixed angle locking screw heads is mainly induced by misinsertion of the screws in a tilted position, not orthogonal to the hole threads, where only a cross‐threading but no locking of the screw head occurs . Although a certain self‐adjustment effect is observed for deviations up to 3° for 2.4 mm fixed angle locking screws with subsequent correct locking, other screw types (e.g., 7.3 mm locking screws) exhibit disengagement with cross‐threading already at marginal inclinations of 2° .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As previously shown in quasi‐static tests, tilted fixed angle locking screws failed at a low bending moment and were therefore not considered in the current study . Loosening of fixed angle locking screw heads is mainly induced by misinsertion of the screws in a tilted position, not orthogonal to the hole threads, where only a cross‐threading but no locking of the screw head occurs . Although a certain self‐adjustment effect is observed for deviations up to 3° for 2.4 mm fixed angle locking screws with subsequent correct locking, other screw types (e.g., 7.3 mm locking screws) exhibit disengagement with cross‐threading already at marginal inclinations of 2° .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Failure mode depends on the head locking mechanism: In the current study, all locking screws failed at the shaft‐head junction. Breakout of the head thread, being described as failure mode of other polyaxial locking systems, using a hoop of softer grade II titanium or a star petal interface for head locking, was not observed, indicating a lasting head locking mechanism in the allowed inclination range of the variable angle locking screws . Overloading the end cap polyaxial locking system, which is based on frictional coupling, exhibited a slippage of the screw head under the end cap at a failure moment comparable to locked fixed angle locking screws but with subsequent relocking when the moment was decreased …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The clinical advantage has been stressed, but some authors [21] have experienced better and more encouraging clinical results with a minimally invasive approach than with a mini-open approach [34]. Most manufacturers allow a 30°cone (15°in each direction), though the optimal cone to avoid harming assembly stability is around 20°(10°in each direction) [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%