1984
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198407000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Biomechanical Study of Normal Functional Wrist Motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
0
17

Year Published

1988
1988
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
47
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Brumfield and Champoux 15 and Palmer et al 16 conducted biomechanical studies of normal functional wrist motion. The range of wrist motion for necessary activities, such as eating, drinking, using a telephone, and reading, was accomplished by motion of 5°of flexion to 35°of extension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brumfield and Champoux 15 and Palmer et al 16 conducted biomechanical studies of normal functional wrist motion. The range of wrist motion for necessary activities, such as eating, drinking, using a telephone, and reading, was accomplished by motion of 5°of flexion to 35°of extension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When either the elbow [82,96] or wrist [40] is constrained, other joints compensate; by inference, joint contribution is determined for functional tasks. Electrogoniometric studies with a gimbal coordinate system provide estimates on elbow [76] and wrist [19,84,94] ROM for functional activities. The functional CMC joint range is harder to assess even with constraining experiments [43,55,74], given the discrete but exacting motion of this joint and the functional restriction splints might impart [87].…”
Section: Thumb Motion Relative To the Upper Limbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the normal wrist extension angle range (20-30°) required for optimal grasp activities in nondisabled people [42][43], individual subject's wrist angle for optimal grasp varied largely (23.6 ± 15.9°), and this might be the reason for the weak correlation between the wrist extension angle and the efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%