1958
DOI: 10.3109/00016355809058011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A biometric study of occlusion and dental arches in a series of medieval skulls from northern sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

1971
1971
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These changes indicate that human mandibles were still evolving, which agrees with many other studies [9][10][11]14,15,17]. Except for ramus height, the decrease of mandible dimensions with statistical significance occurred during the Bronze-Iron Ages to present day, such as bicondylar breadth, bicoronoid breadth, mandible body breadth, mandible length, bigonial breadth, and arc of mandibular bone.…”
Section: The Variations Traits Of Mandible Morphology In Holocene Chisupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These changes indicate that human mandibles were still evolving, which agrees with many other studies [9][10][11]14,15,17]. Except for ramus height, the decrease of mandible dimensions with statistical significance occurred during the Bronze-Iron Ages to present day, such as bicondylar breadth, bicoronoid breadth, mandible body breadth, mandible length, bigonial breadth, and arc of mandibular bone.…”
Section: The Variations Traits Of Mandible Morphology In Holocene Chisupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The symptom of malocclusion includes dentition crowding, and discordance of teeth with alveolar bone. Considering the relatively small change in tooth dimensions in the past thousands years [9][10][11]48], the higher percentage of malocclusion may be caused by a decrease in mandibles.…”
Section: The Variations Traits Of Mandible Morphology In Holocene Chimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Evolutionary studies of the teeth and jaws show a mosaic pattern of reduction over the past 40,000 years, with jaw size reducing more than tooth size (Hyrdlieka, 1930;Lysell, 1958;Goose, 1962;Moore et al, 1968;Lavelle, 1962;Carlson, 1976;Carlson and Van Gerven, 1977;Wolpoff, 1975). This has been attributed to the fact that selective pressures involved primarily affect jaw size, and only secondarily tooth size (Sofaer, 1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%