2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01105.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A biophysical model of Sugarcane growth

Abstract: Scientists predict that global agricultural lands will expand over the next few decades due to increasing demands for food production and an exponential increase in cropbased biofuel production. These changes in land use will greatly impact biogeochemical and biogeophysical cycles across the globe. It is therefore important to develop models that can accurately simulate the interactions between the atmosphere and important crops. In this study, we develop and validate a new process-based sugarcane model (inclu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
44
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Means followed by the same letter in each location do not differ by at 5% probability. enhance productivity of cotton species G. hirsutum and G. barbadense, in the last 50 years, most breeding programs have focused on increases in the net rate of photosynthesis and tolerance to elevated temperatures by increasing stomatal conductance (Radin et al, 1994;Lu et al, 1998;Zhang et al, 2013). However, from a global warm perspective (Trenberth et al, 2007;Cuadra et al, 2012;Marin et al, 2013;Bowman et al, 2013), breeding programs should redirect their efforts to construct more suitable plants to face challenges in new climate scenarios. In this view, plant breeders and physiologists are concentrating their efforts in the construction of plants not only to survive under abiotic stresses but also to be stable and productive in these hard environments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Means followed by the same letter in each location do not differ by at 5% probability. enhance productivity of cotton species G. hirsutum and G. barbadense, in the last 50 years, most breeding programs have focused on increases in the net rate of photosynthesis and tolerance to elevated temperatures by increasing stomatal conductance (Radin et al, 1994;Lu et al, 1998;Zhang et al, 2013). However, from a global warm perspective (Trenberth et al, 2007;Cuadra et al, 2012;Marin et al, 2013;Bowman et al, 2013), breeding programs should redirect their efforts to construct more suitable plants to face challenges in new climate scenarios. In this view, plant breeders and physiologists are concentrating their efforts in the construction of plants not only to survive under abiotic stresses but also to be stable and productive in these hard environments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model represents trees, shrubs, and grasses, along with three major annual crops (corn, soybean, wheat), two perennial grasses managed for biofuel production (switchgrass and miscanthus), and sugarcane [12,13,19]. The model is capable of simulating crop growth and behavior by taking into account management such as irrigation, fertilizer application, planting and harvest date, and cultivar selection.…”
Section: Agro-ibis Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes 12 natural and 6 crop plant functional types (Kucharik and Brye 2003;Vanloocke Cuadra et al 2012). Soybean (Glycine max), maize (Zea mays), wheat (Triticum vulgare Vill), Miscanthus x. giganteus, and switchgrass and sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) representations are also included.…”
Section: Agro-ibis Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, land surface models (LSMs) have been developed in order to simulate different crop types and their responses to climatic variability, resulting in improved early detection of agricultural drought with further mitigation responses (Kucharik et al 2000;Kucharik and Brye 2003;Kucharik and Twine 2007;Lokupitiya et al 2009;Cuadra et al 2012;Mo et al 2011;Ingwersen et al 2011;Crow et al 2012;Song et al 2013;Twine et al 2013). These models take into account crop phenological and physiological processes and their influence on surface water, energy, and carbon exchanges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%