2008
DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.45.4.403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bite to Whet the Reward Appetite: The Influence of Sampling on Reward-Seeking Behaviors

Abstract: for their feedback at different stages of the project and Bridget Kemps for her help in administering the experiments. They also thank the participants of the University of Florida Winter Research Retreat ( 2006) and the two anonymous JMR reviewers for their comments and suggestions. Russ Winer served as guest editor for this article.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
142
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
10
142
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as Plassmann et al (2015) discuss, there exist now a number of studies that have successfully applied neuroscience theories to derive testable predictions about consumer behavior (e.g., Van den Bergh et al, 2008;Wadhwa et al 2008;Tuk et al 2011) without the use of ! 33!…”
Section: ! 27!mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as Plassmann et al (2015) discuss, there exist now a number of studies that have successfully applied neuroscience theories to derive testable predictions about consumer behavior (e.g., Van den Bergh et al, 2008;Wadhwa et al 2008;Tuk et al 2011) without the use of ! 33!…”
Section: ! 27!mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reiterate an important point, Wadhwa et al (2008) were able to progress our understanding of marketing phenomena by building on previous neuroscientific evidence only (i.e., without direct use of neuroscientific methods). In view of the previously mentioned considerable challenges involved in applying these methods (and the extensive need to secure external funding), work along these lines promises to become a key pathway towards neuromarketing research for newcomers with a background in traditional marketing.…”
Section: ! 27!mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on neuroscientific findings that humans (and other animals) pay greater attention and respond more rapidly to sensory stimuli occurring in peripersonal (i.e., close to the body) than extrapersonal space, they find support for the idea that peripersonal warning signals, compared with traditional warning signals, afford significant performance advantages. In another example, Wadhwa et al (2008) generated novel hypotheses, based on physiological theories of "reverse alliesthesia" and neuroscience research on the dopamine system, that consumption cues that are high in incentive value (such as sampling a food or brief experiences with hedonic cues) can strengthen subsequent goal pursuit of rewardseeking behaviors (defined as a representation of an internal state associated with a desirable outcome). The authors found support for their predictions, which ran counter to common views held by marketing practitioners and health experts, that sampling a food generally leads to lower subsequent consumption.…”
Section: Hypothesis Generation and Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This inquiry has been partially answered by research on the relationship between product sampling and consumption motivation (Wadhwa, Shiv & Nowlis, 2008). These researchers first demonstrated that subjects who sampled chocolate in the first phase subsequently and unconsciously indulged in more soft drinks and snacks in the second phase 2 than did those subjects who had not sampled the chocolate.…”
Section: Conceptual Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%