2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A biting commentary: Integrating tooth characters with molecular data doubles known species diversity in a lineage of sea slugs that consume “killer algae”

Abstract: Predicting biotic resistance to highly invasive strains of "killer algae" (Caulerpa spp.) requires understanding the diversity and feeding preferences of native consumers, including sea slugs in family Oxynoidae. Past studies reported low algal host specificity for Oxynoe (6 spp.) and Lobiger (4 spp.), but these taxonomically challenging slugs may represent species complexes of unrecognized specialists that prefer different Caulerpa spp. Here, we assess global diversity of these genera by integrating gene sequ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(128 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no consensus on a minimum COI distance required to delimitate species, and this varies markedly across taxa [65]. However, substantially larger minimum interspecific distances over maximum intraspecific distances often support the recognition of new species [66,67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no consensus on a minimum COI distance required to delimitate species, and this varies markedly across taxa [65]. However, substantially larger minimum interspecific distances over maximum intraspecific distances often support the recognition of new species [66,67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial sequences of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), 16S rRNA (16S), Histone H3 (H3), and 28S rRNA (28S) were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the universal primers: LCO1490 and HCO2198 (Folmer et al., 1994) and custom versions of these primers (see Berriman et al., 2018) for the COI gene (658 bp); 16S ar‐5′ and 16S br‐3′ (Palumbi, 1996) for the 16S gene (435 bp); H3F and H3R (Colgan et al., 2000) for the H3 gene (328 bp). For the 28S gene (1384 bp) three fragments were amplified using the following pairs of primers: 28SC1 and 28SD2R (Vonneman et al., 2005), 28SF2 and 28SR3 (Morgan et al., 2002), and 28SF3 and 28SR1 (Morgan et al., 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no consensus on the minimum COI distance required to classify a species, and each taxon has a different minimum COI distance [37]. Therefore, a minimum interspecies distance greater than the maximum interspecies distance is often applied to identify new species [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%