2020
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2020.2978342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Blind Multiscale Spatial Regularization Framework for Kernel-Based Spectral Unmixing

Abstract: Introducing spatial prior information in hyperspectral imaging (HSI) analysis has led to an overall improvement of the performance of many HSI methods applied for denoising, classification, and unmixing. Extending such methodologies to nonlinear settings is not always straightforward, specially for unmixing problems where the consideration of spatial relationships between neighboring pixels might comprise intricate interactions between their fractional abundances and nonlinear contributions. In this paper, we … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Model-based approaches rely on prior knowledge about the mixing process, including the bilinear mixing model (BLMM) [35], [36], the post-nonlinear mixing model (PNMM) [37], and Hapke's model [38]. On the other hand, model-free methods attempt to learn the nonlinearity directly from the observed data using, e.g., support vector machines [39], algorithms based on graph geodesic distances [40] and kernel-based methods [9], [41]. Recent approaches have relied on deep learning techniques, reviewed in the following.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Model-based approaches rely on prior knowledge about the mixing process, including the bilinear mixing model (BLMM) [35], [36], the post-nonlinear mixing model (PNMM) [37], and Hapke's model [38]. On the other hand, model-free methods attempt to learn the nonlinearity directly from the observed data using, e.g., support vector machines [39], algorithms based on graph geodesic distances [40] and kernel-based methods [9], [41]. Recent approaches have relied on deep learning techniques, reviewed in the following.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the complexity of the mixing process, specifying a precise model can be difficult. This has motivated the development of HU method based on nonparametric models where the nonlinearity is learned from the data, such as in kernel-based methods [9], [41] and nonlinear AEC networks [10], [16], [17]. In this work, we consider a decomposition of the nonlinear mixing process as the sum of a linear term (the LMM) and a nonparametric nonlinear component [9], [17], [91], [92]:…”
Section: A the Mixing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, superpixels are able to group spectrally similar pixels in compact spatial neighborhoods of average size S 2 with excellent preservation of image borders [23]. The superpixel decomposition has been sucesfully applied to construct multiscale transformations used in spectral unmixing applications [26]- [28]. In this paper, we consider the superpixel decomposition in order to divide the pixels n = 1, .…”
Section: A Superpixel-based Graph Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unmixing-based methods make use of the linear mixing model (LMM), which assumes that each pixel in the low resolution image can be represented as a convex combination of the reflectance of a small number of pure spectral signatures, called endmembers [18][19][20]. The LMM has been used for multimodal image fusion by assuming the proportions of each material in a low resolution pixel to be stable/constant over time [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%