2009
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200900239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bonding Quandary—or—A Demonstration of the Fact That Scientists Are Not Born With Logic

Abstract: We document here a spirited debate among three colleagues and friends who have strong opinions on a specific bonding problem, the presence or absence of a cross-ring sulfur-sulfur bond in a trinuclear Cu(3)S(2) cluster. The example may seem esoteric, but through their struggles with this specific bond (and with each other) the authors approach the more general problematic of chemistry, the chemical bond. The discussion focuses on bond lengths and the population of bonding and antibonding orbitals, and on oxida… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
75
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Or maybe it has done so well precisely because the concept is flexible and fuzzy". [16] However, it is important to note that scientific arguments, debates, and controversies are at the heart of chemistry. This situation has been clearly stated in the very recent paper entitled "The Nature of the Fourth Bond in the Ground State of C 2 : The Quadruple Bond Conundrum" by Danovich et al, [17] in which these authors recongnize that they are in front of a "Rashomon effect", in which the bonding picture is becoming too fuzzy to be constructive anymore.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Or maybe it has done so well precisely because the concept is flexible and fuzzy". [16] However, it is important to note that scientific arguments, debates, and controversies are at the heart of chemistry. This situation has been clearly stated in the very recent paper entitled "The Nature of the Fourth Bond in the Ground State of C 2 : The Quadruple Bond Conundrum" by Danovich et al, [17] in which these authors recongnize that they are in front of a "Rashomon effect", in which the bonding picture is becoming too fuzzy to be constructive anymore.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of primary concern to the Alvarez-Hoffmann-Mealli (AHM) argument is the question of whether or not a transmolecular S À S bond exists in 1, a question that has not yet received a definitive answer. [1,3,4] This stirred my enthusiasm, because the gray area between what is to be considered a chemical bond and what is not is one of great interest to me.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recently, this journal published a lively debate [1] between Santiago Alvarez, Roald Hoffmann, and Carlo Mealli about the electronic structure of a trigonally symmetric complex with a {Cu 3 S 2 } 3 + core (1) shown in Figure 1, which was first synthesized by the Tolman group. [2] This complex is not only an interesting model for biologically important coppersulfur clusters, but also poses inherent problems in its electronic structure and its relationship to the salient structural and magnetic features of the compound.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of them are unambiguous, however, and different analyses can lead to conflicting interpretations, even concerning the most fundamental question of whether or not atoms are linked by a chemical bond. [1,2] One of the indicators that can be probed experimentally is the indirect spin-spin coupling constant (SSCC). For instance, observation of spinspin coupling across hydrogen bonds [3] has been taken as evidence for covalent contributions to this kind of bonding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%