2013
DOI: 10.1080/10485252.2012.752487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bootstrap method to test for the existence of finite moments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, there is a simple bootstrap test for testing the existence of moments directly (Fedotenkov, 2013), which we explain briefly.…”
Section: Testing the Existence Of Moments Directlymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, there is a simple bootstrap test for testing the existence of moments directly (Fedotenkov, 2013), which we explain briefly.…”
Section: Testing the Existence Of Moments Directlymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in the literature only few statistical methods exist to verify or disprove the existence of moments, given a specific sample of random variables (see e.g. [20,15,22,10,12,11]) . One of the earlier methods to verify the existence of moments of a distribution was proposed in 1963 by Mandelbrot (see [20] and [8]).…”
Section: Statistical Methods To Test the Existence Of Moments Of A Ra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side, if the theoretical moment does not exist, the estimated moment will diverge or behave unstable when the sample size increases. However, this quite intuitive method is rather heuristic and depends highly on the experience of the researcher (see also [10]). Another popular direct way to investigate the existence of moments of a certain distribution is the sample-based estimation of a decay rate α for the corresponding density function proposed by Hill in [15].…”
Section: Statistical Methods To Test the Existence Of Moments Of A Ra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the method of Fedotenkov (2013), the test proposed in this paper is based on the strong law of large numbers, when the first moment does not exist as developed by Derman and Robbins (1955). The advantage of our proposal is that it is incomparably faster -the time gained being proportional to the number of bootstrap subsamples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A direct bootstrap-based method for testing if the first finite moment exists was developed by Fedotenkov (2013), using the fact that under some general conditions, if the first moment does not exist, the arithmetic mean of the sample diverges to infinity faster than the arithmetic means of the subsamples of a smaller size. Following the method of Fedotenkov (2013), the test proposed in this paper is based on the strong law of large numbers, when the first moment does not exist as developed by Derman and Robbins (1955).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%