A Bottom-up picture of intra-national welfare regimes: the case of marginalised communities in Puerto Rico

Abstract

The main purpose of this article is twofold: (1) an examination of welfare regimes using a bottom-up approach, which enables a comprehensive analysis of welfare production based on recipients perceptions; and (2) an examination of more than one type of welfare-mix coexisting inside the national level across policy sectors. A classification of welfare regimes is carried out following a bottom-up approach and relying on the basis of the importance of welfare providers to satisfy social risks and promote well-being. Three traditional (e.g. state, market, family) and one alternative welfare providers (e.g. community) are considered. Data is collected through twenty semi-structured interviews in seven marginalised communities of Puerto Rico. The results show five configurations of intra-national welfare-mixes across the following welfare areas: housing, nourishment, health, education, maternity/paternity, disability, work-unemployment and older-age. This paper contributes to the theoretical proposals of intra-national welfare regimes, and alternatives providers in the welfare-mix.

Welfare regimes in twenty-first-century Latin America

“…The same is true for differences in other areas of social policy, such as education, or income replacement programmes. Cruz-Martínez’s (2020) qualitative study suggests wide variability in the welfare mix across regions and across policy areas within the same country.…”