2016 Twenty Second National Conference on Communication (NCC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ncc.2016.7561182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bound-achieving modified Etzion-Vardy (5, 3) projective space code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The replacements are chosen only among vectors which preserve the Schubert cell signature of each subspace. The details of constructing the MEV (modified EV) code have been given in [18] and are briefly recounted here for completeness. The line l 2 (S1) is a subspace of the orthogonal complement of the line l 5 (S2); hence it was attempted to modify either of them by changing a single vector at a time.…”
Section: A the Minimal Change Strategy: Mev Code And Its Dualmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The replacements are chosen only among vectors which preserve the Schubert cell signature of each subspace. The details of constructing the MEV (modified EV) code have been given in [18] and are briefly recounted here for completeness. The line l 2 (S1) is a subspace of the orthogonal complement of the line l 5 (S2); hence it was attempted to modify either of them by changing a single vector at a time.…”
Section: A the Minimal Change Strategy: Mev Code And Its Dualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors have shown that the basic building blocks of these codes are maximal partial spreads of 2-dimensional subspaces in a 5dimensional ambient space. An optimal (5, 3) 2 projective space code was reported in [18], which was obtained by a strategy of minimal changes to a nearly optimal code given by Etzion-Vardy in [13]. Both the Etzion-Vardy (EV) code and the optimal variant can be described in terms of maximal partial spreads of 2-dimensional subspaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach ( for instance, in [8,12,13]) involves puncturing known constant dimension codes and adding suitable subspaces to increase the overall code-size. An optimal binary (5, 3) projective space code was reported in [14], which was obtained by a strategy of minimal changes to the nearly optimal code given by Etzion and Vardy in [7]. Both the Etzion-Vardy (EV) code and the optimal variant can be described in terms of maximal partial spreads of 2-dimensional (vector) subspaces in a 5-dimensional ambient (vector) space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we consider the associated projective geometry PG(4, 2), the 2-subspaces and 3-subspaces are the lines and planes of the geometry, respectively. In obtaining the optimal code in [14], results from the classification of maximal partial line spreads of PG (4,2), as presented in [15] (cf. [13,16]), were used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%