2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2011.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bound on the order of a group having a large character degree

Abstract: Communicated by Michel BrouéKeywords: Irreducible character degree Group order upper bound Let d be the degree of an irreducible character of a finite group G.We can write |G| = d(d +e) for some non-negative integer e. In this document, we prove that if e > 1 then |G| < e 6 − e 4 . This improves an upper bound found by Isaacs of the form Be 6 , where B is an unknown universal constant. We also describe conditions sufficient to sharpen this bound to |G| e 4 − e 3 . In addition, we remove the appeal to the class… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. We may apply Theorem 5.2 of [5] to see that G has a character χ ∈ Irr(G) which dominates all the other irreducible characters of G and by Lemma 2.1 of [5], χ(1) = d. By Lemma 4.2 of [5], we know that G has a minimal normal subgroup N such that χ vanishes off of N and G acts transitively on N \ {1}. This implies that χ vanishes on all but two conjugacy classes of G, and so, χ is a Gagola character.…”
Section: Gagola Pairsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Proof. We may apply Theorem 5.2 of [5] to see that G has a character χ ∈ Irr(G) which dominates all the other irreducible characters of G and by Lemma 2.1 of [5], χ(1) = d. By Lemma 4.2 of [5], we know that G has a minimal normal subgroup N such that χ vanishes off of N and G acts transitively on N \ {1}. This implies that χ vanishes on all but two conjugacy classes of G, and so, χ is a Gagola character.…”
Section: Gagola Pairsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first use the results in [5] to reduce the initial question to a question regarding Gagola pairs. Since |G| = d(d + e), to prove |G| ≤ e 4 − e 3 it suffices to prove that d ≤ e 2 − e and to prove |G| ≤ e 4 + e 3 , it suffices to prove that d ≤ e 2 .…”
Section: Gagola Pairsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Я. Берковичем в [4] классифицированы группы при e = 1 и e = 2. Для e > 1 М. Айзекс в [5] показал, что |G| ≤ Be 6 для некоторой постоянной B. К. Дюрфи и С. Дженсен в [6] доказали, что |G| ≤ e 6 − e 4 . А по М. Льюису, d ≤ e 2 − e и |G| ≤ e 4 − e 3 -наилучшее возможное ограничение [7].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified