1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(97)00133-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A boundary element analysis of misaligned load-carrying cruciform welded joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, thermal oxidation leaded a reduction in the fatigue strength of around 34 %. Similarly 24% decrease in fatigue strength of a Ti6Al4V alloy was reported by Li et al [12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Thus, thermal oxidation leaded a reduction in the fatigue strength of around 34 %. Similarly 24% decrease in fatigue strength of a Ti6Al4V alloy was reported by Li et al [12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…14). Below this propagation rate the material exhibits a deviation from the Paris relationship (equation ( 3)) used by various workers [15][16][17] to describe crack growth in welds. Thus a simple linear relationship between stress intensity and growth rates on logarithmic scales is only accurate when the joints are subjected to high stress ratio or high nominal loads producing crack growth a initial cyclic damage in form of cyclic hardening or softening, e.g.…”
Section: Fatigue Of Welded Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the vast majority of previous experimental studies [15] have focused on single-or double-sided fillet welds where the adjoined plate member is subjected to axial membrane loading having only secondary bending due to the angular distortion or the axial offset of adjoined plate members, as in [16] . Supposedly, there are two main reasons for this: Firstly, the root fatigue capacity of double-sided fillet welded joints subjected to bending is much higher than joint subjected under axial tension and consequently, careful consideration of potential root fatigue is particularly required in the case of axial loading [17][18][19]. Secondly, due to complexity of bending test procedure, axial tension tests have been preferred [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%