2007
DOI: 10.1155/2007/78029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Boundary Harnack Principle for Infinity-Laplacian and Some Related Results

Abstract: We prove a boundary comparison principle for positive infinity-harmonic functions for smooth boundaries. As consequences, we obtain (a) a doubling property for certain positive infinity-harmonic functions in smooth bounded domains and the half-space, and (b) the optimality of blowup rates of Aronsson's examples of singular solutions in cones.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When p=∞ the proof is similar, but then the comparison argument uses cones (which are ∞-harmonic) in place of the function φ p (x) defined on [4, page 286], and therefore the exterior ball condition is not needed. See also [14] for the case p=∞.…”
Section: Lemma 24 Assume That P∈(1 ∞]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When p=∞ the proof is similar, but then the comparison argument uses cones (which are ∞-harmonic) in place of the function φ p (x) defined on [4, page 286], and therefore the exterior ball condition is not needed. See also [14] for the case p=∞.…”
Section: Lemma 24 Assume That P∈(1 ∞]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See also [37,38,39] for similar as well as stronger estimates in more general geometries. When p = ∞ the proof is similar, but then the comparison argument uses cones (which are ∞-harmonic) in place of the function φ p (x) defined on [8, page 286], and therefore the exterior ball condition is not needed see [14] for the case p = ∞.…”
Section: Lemma 26mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use now the standard Harnack inequality for infinity harmonic functions in Θ (see e.g. [5]) to derive the existence of c This implies that for a fixed σ 0 ∈ S, one has…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two functions ψ α and ω α depend only on the variable φ ∈ (0, α] and are unique in the class of rotanionnaly invariant solutions up to multiplication by constants. This study reduced to an ordinary differential equation which has been already treated by T. Bhattacharya in [4] and [5]. But for the sake of completeness and for some related problems we present it in Section 3 of the present paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%