2017
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2017.836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A boundary integral method with volume-changing objects for ultrasound-triggered margination of microbubbles

Abstract: A variety of numerical methods exist for the study of deformable particles in dense suspensions. None of the standard tools, however, currently include volume-changing objects such as oscillating microbubbles in three-dimensional periodic domains. In the first part of this work, we develop a novel method to include such entities based on the boundary integral method. We show that the well-known boundary integral equation must be amended with two additional terms containing the volume flux through the bubble su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
(253 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The forces are computed as described by Guckenberger et al [78], with Method C therein being used for the bending contribution. An unavoidable artificial volume drift of the cell is countered by adjusting the velocity to obey the no-flux condition and by a subsequent rescaling of the object [79,80]. Moreover, the channel is represented by 2166 flat triangles.…”
Section: B Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The forces are computed as described by Guckenberger et al [78], with Method C therein being used for the bending contribution. An unavoidable artificial volume drift of the cell is countered by adjusting the velocity to obey the no-flux condition and by a subsequent rescaling of the object [79,80]. Moreover, the channel is represented by 2166 flat triangles.…”
Section: B Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corners are rounded to prevent numerical problems (compare figure 2). Rather than prescribing a zero velocity at the channel walls, we use a penalty method for efficiency reasons with a spring constant of κ W = 1.9 × 10 7 N/m 3 [6,80]. Increasing the triangle counts and the box length L x did not change the results significantly.…”
Section: B Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations